# MolDesignBench: Evaluating LLM-based Agent for Scenario-grounded Molecular Design

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27349 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27349/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Medical and scientific domain agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/medical-and-scientific-domain-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15334/) (2023)
- [ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05376/) (2023)
- [API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08244/) (2023)
- [ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04682/) (2024)
- [Molecular Sets (MOSES): A Benchmarking Platform for Molecular Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12823/) (2018)
- [AgentClinic: a multimodal agent benchmark to evaluate AI in simulated clinical environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07960/) (2024)
- [What can Large Language Models do in chemistry? A comprehensive benchmark on eight tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18365/) (2023)
- [Sample Efficiency Matters: A Benchmark for Practical Molecular Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.12411/) (2022)
- [Mol-Instructions: A Large-Scale Biomolecular Instruction Dataset for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08018/) (2023)
- [LlaSMol: Advancing Large Language Models for Chemistry with a Large-Scale, Comprehensive, High-Quality Instruction Tuning Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09391/) (2024)
- [ACEBench: Who Wins the Match Point in Tool Usage?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12851/) (2025)
- [Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17238/) (2025)
- [Beyond Chemical QA: Evaluating LLM's Chemical Reasoning with Modular Chemical Operations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21318/) (2025)
- [ToolTalk: Evaluating Tool-Usage in a Conversational Setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10775/) (2023)
- [Speak-to-Structure: Evaluating LLMs in Open-domain Natural Language-Driven Molecule Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14642/) (2024)
- [MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18961/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Real-world molecular design remains challenging for large language model (LLM)-based agents. It requires them to interpret design contexts, satisfy multiple constraints, identify infeasible specifications, and reason over multi-step tool outputs. Existing benchmarks do not capture this complexity, focusing instead on explicit and narrow constraints, only feasible problems, and single-path solutions. To address this gap, we propose MolDesignBench, a scenario-grounded benchmark that more closely reflects real-world molecular design for evaluating tool-augmented LLM agents. MolDesignBench comprises 2K generation and optimization instances that combine implicit requirements embedded in design narratives with explicit property and functional-group constraints, including infeasible cases, and require the effective use of 17 specialized chemistry tools. Experiments across diverse frontier LLMs reveal low success rates--with the best achieving only ~43%--and frequent failures in implicit-constraint reasoning, infeasibility detection, and tool reasoning. The corresponding fine-grained failure-mode analysis identifies implicit constraint interpretation and infeasibility detection as the primary bottlenecks, establishing MolDesignBench as a rigorous testbed to guide future research on chemical agents. The benchmark, tool interface, and evaluation code are publicly available.