# Can Vision-Language Models Analyze Human-Centered Video? Mapping Model Capabilities and Human-AI Collaborative Workflows

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27327 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27327/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Video understanding with MLLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 68 of its 168 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Video understanding with MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/video-understanding-with-mllms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 68)

- [PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03378/) (2023)
- [Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Video](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07058/) (2021)
- [Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.21075/) (2024)
- [MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17005/) (2023)
- [EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09126/) (2023)
- [NExT-GPT: Any-to-Any Multimodal LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05519/) (2023)
- [Hollywood in Homes: Crowdsourcing Data Collection for Activity Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.01753/) (2016)
- [ShareGPT4Video: Improving Video Understanding and Generation with Better Captions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04325/) (2024)
- [TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00476/) (2024)
- [Perception Test: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Multimodal Video Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13786/) (2023)
- [Multimodal Foundation Models: From Specialists to General-Purpose Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10020/) (2023)
- [Word-level Deep Sign Language Recognition from Video: A New Large-scale Dataset and Methods Comparison](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11006/) (2019)
- [VIEScore: Towards Explainable Metrics for Conditional Image Synthesis Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14867/) (2023)
- [HoloAssist: an Egocentric Human Interaction Dataset for Interactive AI Assistants in the Real World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17024/) (2023)
- [Video Question Answering: Datasets, Algorithms and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.01225/) (2022)
- [Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12259/) (2024)
- [VidHalluc: Evaluating Temporal Hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models for Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03735/) (2024)
- [Rethinking Model Evaluation as Narrowing the Socio-Technical Gap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03100/) (2023)
- [LLMs as Research Tools: A Large Scale Survey of Researchers' Usage and Perceptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.05025/) (2024)
- [GUI-World: A Video Benchmark and Dataset for Multimodal GUI-oriented Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10819/) (2024)
- [MIntRec: A New Dataset for Multimodal Intent Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.04355/) (2022)
- [MammalNet: A Large-scale Video Benchmark for Mammal Recognition and Behavior Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00576/) (2023)
- [A note on the triangle inequality for the Jaccard distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.02696/) (2016)
- [CoAIcoder: Examining the Effectiveness of AI-assisted Human-to-Human Collaboration in Qualitative Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05560/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models in Qualitative Research: Uses, Tensions, and Intentions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07362/) (2024)
- [Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12557/) (2025)
- [T2Vs Meet VLMs: A Scalable Multimodal Dataset for Visual Harmfulness Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19734/) (2024)
- [SANPO: A Scene Understanding, Accessibility and Human Navigation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12172/) (2023)
- [Vision-Based Multimodal Interfaces: A Survey and Taxonomy for Enhanced Context-Aware System Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13443/) (2025)
- [HABIT: Human-Aware Behavior and Interaction Training Dataset for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.31682/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Video provides a rich record of human behavior, interaction, and situated contexts, offering important evidence for understanding people and conducting human-centered research. As vision-language models (VLMs) become increasingly capable of analyzing video, they offer opportunities to automate this traditionally human-intensive process. Yet a central question remains: when can VLMs analyze human-centered video independently, and when does reliable analysis still require human involvement? To address this question, we first characterize video analysis practices in human-centered research. We systematically analyze all 1,702 CHI 2026 full papers and identify 125 that annotate videos. Through iterative coding, we derive a five-dimensional taxonomy spanning analytic purpose, viewpoint, phenomenon, reasoning requirement, and annotation authority. Grounded in recurring annotation tasks captured by this taxonomy, we construct a benchmark of 15 representative tasks from open datasets to map the capabilities and limitations of a general-purpose VLM. We examine the division of labor between humans and VLMs by comparing three annotation workflows: VLM alone, human alone, and human verification of VLM outputs. Across tasks, VLM-alone annotation approaches human accuracy on average (HNS = 97.0, where 100 denotes human-alone performance), demonstrating substantial potential to automate human-centered video analysis. Human verification achieves the highest accuracy (HNS = 121.5) while reducing human annotation time by 48.9% and monetary cost by 31.3%-44.5% relative to human-alone annotation. Our findings connect real-world human-centered video analysis tasks and current VLM capabilities, and clarify how human-AI collaboration can make VLM-assisted analysis reliable and efficient.