# A Systematic Benchmark of Explainable Methods for Temporal Attribution in Sequential Recommendation Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27201 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27201/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.11942/) (2019)
- [Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17453/) (2023)
- [Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.02685/) (2017)
- [Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.08608/) (2017)
- [Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09781/) (2018)
- [BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.06690/) (2019)
- [Attention is not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10186/) (2019)
- [Session-based Recommendations with Recurrent Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06939/) (2015)
- [Attention is not not Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04626/) (2019)
- [Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09838/) (2020)
- [Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.03296/) (2017)
- [Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07896/) (2020)
- [ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03429/) (2019)
- [A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10758/) (2018)
- [Personalized Top-N Sequential Recommendation via Convolutional Sequence Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.07426/) (2018)
- [Is Attention Interpretable?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03731/) (2019)
- [Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.11192/) (2018)
- [Behavior Sequence Transformer for E-commerce Recommendation in Alibaba](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06874/) (2019)
- [A Simple Convolutional Generative Network for Next Item Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.05163/) (2018)
- [Do Transformer Modifications Transfer Across Implementations and Applications?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.11972/) (2021)
- [KuaiRand: An Unbiased Sequential Recommendation Dataset with Randomly Exposed Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.08696/) (2022)
- [Learning to Estimate Shapley Values with Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05282/) (2022)
- [Structured Self-Attention Weights Encode Semantics in Sentiment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.04922/) (2020)
- [Limitations of Normalization in Attention Mechanism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17821/) (2025)
- [FinTRec: Transformer Based Unified Contextual Ads Targeting and Personalization for Financial Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.14865/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Sequential RecSys are central to modern personalization, exploiting user's historical interaction sequences to drive next-step decisions. Deep learning models, particularly CNN and Transformer-based architectures, have proven highly effective at capturing temporal dependencies in these histories. For transparency and trust, understanding which past interactions drive a given recommendation is increasingly important --- both for developers auditing model behavior and for users seeking a rationale. However, the non-linearities that give these models their predictive power also render them black boxes, making it difficult to attribute decisions to specific interactions. While gradient-based, perturbation-based, and attention-based explainability methods exist, a systematic benchmark of their faithfulness for sequential recommendation is missing. We address this gap by introducing a dual-model masking metric in which one model supplies per-timestep attribution scores and a separately trained, masking-robust probe measures the resulting change in predicted probability. Using this metric, we benchmark ten XAI methods across CNN, Transformer, SASRec, and BERT4Rec backbones on KuaiRand and MovieLens, complemented by analyses of temporal attribution patterns, item popularity confounding, and robustness to input corruption. Our key findings are: (1) gradient-based methods, particularly GradientSHAP and Integrated Gradients, yield the most faithful and robust attributions; (2) raw attention weights are unreliable, but gradient-weighted attention restores faithfulness on shorter sequences, with degradation on longer horizons as softmax attention probabilities converge toward uniform importance scores, diminishing the method's ability to identify informative interactions; and (3) temporal attribution patterns in faithful methods reflect genuine task structure rather than recency or popularity bias.