# Grow the Harness, Not the Context: From Strategy-Free Scaffolds to Reusable Specialist Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26760 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.26760/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01910/) (2022)
- [Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10509/) (2022)
- [ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10144/) (2023)
- [FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05176/) (2023)
- [DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03714/) (2023)
- [RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18665/) (2024)
- [Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03495/) (2023)
- [GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19457/) (2025)
- [Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.28052/) (2026)
- [Large Language Models as Tool Makers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17126/) (2023)
- [Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11695/) (2024)
- [Is Your LLM Secretly a World Model of the Internet? Model-Based Planning for Web Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.06559/) (2024)
- [CRAFT: Customizing LLMs by Creating and Retrieving from Specialized Toolsets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17428/) (2023)
- [AgentOccam: A Simple Yet Strong Baseline for LLM-Based Web Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13825/) (2024)
- [Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11977/) (2025)
- [AutoHarness: improving LLM agents by automatically synthesizing a code harness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03329/) (2026)
- [Evolving Agents in the Dark: Retrospective Harness Optimization via Self-Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05922/) (2026)
- [VeRO: A Harness for Agents to Optimize Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22480/) (2026)
- [Do Agent Optimizers Compound? A Continual-Learning Evaluation on Terminal-Bench 2.0](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14004/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Raven: The Harness of Harnesses for Composable Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33439/) (2026)
- [Beyond Skill Evolution: Self-Evolving Context Management Policies for Long-Horizon Agent Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34649/) (2026)
- [From Existing Methods to New Research Ideas: Two Perspectives on Recursive Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14625/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) agents often handle streams of related tasks, yet standard harnesses repeatedly ask the model to reconstruct the same control decisions inside each task's context. We study whether task feedback can instead turn recurring control into reusable executable code, while reserving LLM calls for task-specific semantic reasoning. We introduce Growing Harness, a failure-guided training paradigm that learns the agent harness itself from a strategy-free scaffold that exposes fixed model and tool interfaces but encodes no task-solving controller. Function-level execution traces localize each failure to a bounded code surface, an optimizer repairs a window of failures jointly, and a success-first held-out gate rolls back repair sequences that harm prior capability. Accepted edits accumulate in one shared harness, allowing its control structure to emerge from task feedback. Across BrowseComp-Plus and WebArena-Verified with three deployment models from 4B to 120B parameters, Growing Harness achieves the highest mean success in five of six benchmark-model settings and trails the best mean by 0.7 pp. in the sixth. Relative to a Tool-Calling agent, it reduces LLM calls by 76.0-91.8% and deployed-agent inference cost by 74.4-98.6%. On WebArena-Verified, its success remains 44.7-45.3% across model scales, whereas Tool-Calling falls to 6.7% with the 4B model. Ablations show that trace-local edits, joint repair, and gate-based rollback each improve final success. These results show that persistent program growth can move recurring control out of model context and into low-cost code, yielding reusable specialist agents that remain effective with smaller deployment models.