# Component Type, Not Reconstruction Error, Predicts Attention Quantization Sensitivity

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26173 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.26173/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05457/) (2018)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11641/) (2019)
- [GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17323/) (2022)
- [SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10438/) (2022)
- [AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Acceleration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00978/) (2023)
- [LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.07339/) (2022)
- [OmniQuant: Omnidirectionally Calibrated Quantization for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.13137/) (2023)
- [QuIP: 2-Bit Quantization of Large Language Models With Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13304/) (2023)
- [HAWQ: Hessian AWare Quantization of Neural Networks with Mixed-Precision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.03696/) (2019)
- [QuIP#: Even Better LLM Quantization with Hadamard Incoherence and Lattice Codebooks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04396/) (2024)
- [SpQR: A Sparse-Quantized Representation for Near-Lossless LLM Weight Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03078/) (2023)
- [SqueezeLLM: Dense-and-Sparse Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07629/) (2023)
- [HAWQ-V2: Hessian Aware trace-Weighted Quantization of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03852/) (2019)
- [QAQ: Quality Adaptive Quantization for LLM KV Cache](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04643/) (2024)
- [The Super Weight in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07191/) (2024)
- [Quantization Error Propagation: Revisiting Layer-Wise Post-Training Quantization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09629/) (2025)
- [ResQ: Mixed-Precision Quantization of Large Language Models with Low-Rank Residuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14363/) (2024)
- [APTQ: Attention-aware Post-Training Mixed-Precision Quantization for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14866/) (2024)
- [Towards Superior Quantization Accuracy: A Layer-sensitive Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06518/) (2025)
- [Precision Where It Matters: A Novel Spike Aware Mixed-Precision Quantization Strategy for LLaMA-based Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.21553/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Many post-training quantization (PTQ) methods use layer-wise reconstruction, second-order proxy objectives, or activation-aware transformations to reduce quantization-induced error. Whether that error signal predicts the downstream functional impact of quantizing an individual attention projection has not been directly characterized. We sweep nine open-weight language models (1.3B--8B parameters; OPT, GPT-J, LLaMA-1/2/3, Mistral, Qwen 2.5) and quantize one attention projection at a time under round-to-nearest (RTN) and, for seven models, GPTQ at 3 and 4 bits, recording reconstruction error, perplexity change, and per-projection activation-weighted quantization error for 3,808 distinct measurements. We find: (1) within a given component type (Q, K, V, or O), reconstruction error explains less than 10% of the variance in perplexity sensitivity in 27 of 36 cases under RTN, with median R^2 = 0.044; (2) both component type and layer identity explain more variance than reconstruction error in all 9 models, with layer identity the strongest predictor in 7 of 9 models and component type strongest in the remaining 2; (3) value (V) projections are the most commonly dominant component, accounting for 38--51% of total positive Delta PPL in seven of nine models; (4) the dominant component is broadly preserved between RTN and GPTQ (5 of 7 cases); and (5) activation-weighted quantization error is a moderately better within-component predictor than reconstruction error for V projections specifically (median R^2 of 0.20 vs. 0.06). These findings indicate that relative weight reconstruction error alone is insufficient for sensitivity-aware bit allocation, and that V projections merit dedicated consideration in mixed-precision schemes.