# IndustrialVLA-Bench: A Traceable Multi-Axis Evaluation of Open Robot Policy Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25562 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25562/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and robot world models, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [Embodied and robot world models](https://mlsanity.com/wm/embodied-and-robot-world-models/)
- Vision-language-action models / [Failure recovery and robustness](https://mlsanity.com/vla/failure-recovery-and-robustness/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24164/) (2024)
- [RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06817/) (2022)
- [LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03310/) (2023)
- [RDT-1B: a Diffusion Foundation Model for Bimanual Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07864/) (2024)
- [FAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09747/) (2025)
- [CALVIN: A Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03227/) (2021)
- [Fast-WAM: Do World Action Models Need Test-time Future Imagination?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16666/) (2026)
- [Cosmos Policy: Fine-Tuning Video Models for Visuomotor Control and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16163/) (2026)
- [LIBERO-PRO: Towards Robust and Fair Evaluation of Vision-Language-Action Models Beyond Memorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03827/) (2025)
- [LeRobot: An Open-Source Library for End-to-End Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22818/) (2026)
- [Xiaomi-Robotics-0: An Open-Sourced Vision-Language-Action Model with Real-Time Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12684/) (2026)
- [Do World Action Models Generalize Better than VLAs? A Robustness Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22078/) (2026)
- [VLA-Arena: An Open-Source Framework for Benchmarking Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.22539/) (2025)
- [LIBERO-Para: A Diagnostic Benchmark and Metrics for Paraphrase Robustness in VLA Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.28301/) (2026)
- [HazardArena: Evaluating Semantic Safety in Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12447/) (2026)
- [vla-eval: A Unified Evaluation Harness for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.13966/) (2026)
- [LangGap: Diagnosing and Closing the Language Gap in Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00592/) (2026)
- [An Open-Source Software Toolkit & Benchmark Suite for the Evaluation and Adaptation of Multimodal Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09172/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [What Breaks in Multi-Image Schema Application? Factorial Oracle Interventions Reveal an Instance-Information Bottleneck](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19611/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Open robot policies increasingly follow two paradigms: vision-language-action models (VLAs) directly map observations and instructions to actions, whereas world-action models (WAMs) incorporate learned video or world dynamics into policy learning or action generation. Although both target the same manipulation tasks and represent alternative design choices, they are commonly reported under different evaluation protocols, leaving their capability, robustness, language sensitivity, and deployment-cost trade-offs unclear. We present IndustrialVLA-Bench, an evidence-aware evaluation of six released VLA and WAM systems under a unified reporting schema. It separately evaluates clean capability on LIBERO, non-language robustness on LIBERO-Plus, instruction sensitivity on LIBERO-Para, and observed execution cost. Reported task scores aggregate three complete evaluations with distinct random seeds under a fixed checkpoint and inference configuration. Across all six systems, clean LIBERO averages differ by only 1.58 points, whereas robustness and paraphrase summaries span 14.62 and 31.08 points. Restricting every comparison to the three protocol-faithful systems preserves the effect (1.36, 14.62 and 23.10 points), so the diagnostic separation reported here does not depend on the weaker evidence tiers. We additionally report observed inference latency, peak memory, runtime mode, and an evidence status for every system. Protocol-faithful, near-reproduction, and pending-verification entries remain visibly separated; only protocol-faithful entries support strict comparisons. Rather than claiming universal superiority of either paradigm, IndustrialVLA-Bench provides traceable evidence for comparing released robot policies on shared practical criteria. Code and evaluation records are available at https://github.com/xiaoqi-7/IndustrialVLA-Bench.