# Deep Reinforcement Learning on Item-Compatibility Graphs for One-Dimensional Bin Packing

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25397 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25397/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL for robot navigation and UAV control, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 17 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for robot navigation and UAV control](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-robot-navigation-and-uav-control/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10903/) (2017)
- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00826/) (2018)
- [Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.01783/) (2016)
- [Pointer Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03134/) (2015)
- [Attention, Learn to Solve Routing Problems!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08475/) (2018)
- [Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizon](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.06128/) (2018)
- [Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09940/) (2016)
- [Learning Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms over Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.01665/) (2017)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Solving the Vehicle Routing Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.04240/) (2018)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03600/) (2020)
- [Learning Combinatorial Optimization on Graphs: A Survey with Applications to Networking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11081/) (2020)
- [Solving a New 3D Bin Packing Problem with Deep Reinforcement Learning Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.05930/) (2017)
- [One model Packs Thousands of Items with Recurrent Conditional Query Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06726/) (2021)
- [Machine Learning for the Multi-Dimensional Bin Packing Problem: Literature Review and Empirical Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08103/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The one-dimensional bin packing problem (1D-BPP) is a classical NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem with applications ranging from logistics and manufacturing to cloud resource management. Although deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has become a competitive paradigm for data-driven optimization, most learned packing methods target 2D and 3D variants, and intelligent learned solvers for 1D-BPP remain scarce. In this paper, we present a novel end-to-end, size-agnostic graph reinforcement learning framework for 1D-BPP. We formulate the packing process as a Markov decision process on an item-compatibility graph, serving as a structural knowledge representation in which every action merges two partial bins that fit together. A graph neural network actor-critic policy extracts relational features from this representation and is trained through reinforcement learning and decoded by stochastic beam search, enabling a single trained model to generalize zero-shot to instances of any size. We conduct a systematic empirical study across graph encoders, DRL algorithms, reward functions, training distributions, and hyperparameters. Evaluated zero-shot on the full BPPLIB benchmark against a constructive heuristic, a grouping genetic algorithm, and recent learned methods, our data-driven policy lowers the mean optimality gap of the constructive heuristic from 2.66% to 2.31%, with the largest gains on structured instances. Against learned baselines evaluated on the same benchmark, it attains a lower gap on most of the nine families and is far more stable across instance distributions. On the hardest benchmark family, it outperforms a state-of-the-art learned solver that relies on column generation and integer programming, while using no solver at all. A grouping genetic algorithm remains ahead overall, and we analyze where and why the residual gap arises.