# iSDFT: Information-Proximal Self-Distillation for Continual Learning in LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24646 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24646/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation.
- Builds on 37 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Knowledge distillation / [On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/on-policy-and-self-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00796/) (2016)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07569/) (2018)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07753/) (2022)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Application](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00487/) (2023)
- [An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08747/) (2023)
- [Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10792/) (2023)
- [Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18734/) (2026)
- [On-Policy Context Distillation for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12275/) (2026)
- [Entropy-Aware On-Policy Distillation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.07079/) (2026)
- [A Survey of On-Policy Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00626/) (2026)
- [On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05629/) (2025)
- [Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24472/) (2026)
- [Self-Distillation Bridges Distribution Gap in Language Model Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13669/) (2024)
- [Self-Distillation Zero: Self-Revision Turns Binary Rewards into Dense Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12002/) (2026)
- [CRISP: Compressed Reasoning via Iterative Self-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05433/) (2026)
- [Stable On-Policy Distillation through Adaptive Target Reformulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07155/) (2026)
- [Scalable Power Sampling: Unlocking Efficient, Training-Free Reasoning for LLMs via Distribution Sharpening](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21590/) (2026)
- [TAID: Temporally Adaptive Interpolated Distillation for Efficient Knowledge Transfer in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16937/) (2025)
- [Adaptive Teacher Exposure for Self-Distillation in LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11458/) (2026)
- [Anti-Self-Distillation for Reasoning RL via Pointwise Mutual Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11609/) (2026)
- [Bourbaki: Self-Generated and Goal-Conditioned MDPs for Theorem Proving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02726/) (2025)
- [On-Policy Replay for Continual Supervised Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29495/) (2026)
- [Trust-Region Behavior Blending for On-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.31159/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

On-policy self-distillation fine-tuning (SDFT) learns new skills from demonstrations while reducing forgetting, but it always distils toward the full demonstration-conditioned teacher. This fixes teacher influence at the full-teacher endpoint, providing no control over how much demonstration information should be transferred at each prediction state. We introduce Information-Proximal SDFT (iSDFT), which instead treats the teacher as a budgeted source of information. At each token, iSDFT selects the distribution closest to the current student that satisfies a prescribed teacher-information constraint, yielding a closed-form exponential target with a locally determined tilt. To control cumulative drift, we further anchor the student to its frozen base policy. Across four heterogeneous LLM backbones and two specialisation tasks, iSDFT improves vanilla SDFT in 7 of 8 model-task settings and matches it in the remaining one. It also provides tighter retention on the original SDFT benchmark suite, with 73% of evaluations remaining within 0.5 points of the base model versus 52% for the strongest baseline, while achieving the largest mean improvement on all ten additional mathematics, coding, and competition-mathematics benchmarks. These results show that controlling how much and when teacher information is introduced improves specialisation while preserving broader capability.