# Monitorable Chart Reasoning Agents via Verifiable Process Rewards

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24071 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.24071/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Gemma 3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19786/) (2025)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Visual-RFT: Visual Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01785/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-CoT: Let Vision Language Models Reason Step-by-Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10440/) (2024)
- [ChartBench: A Benchmark for Complex Visual Reasoning in Charts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15915/) (2023)
- [Making Reasoning Matter: Measuring and Improving Faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13950/) (2024)
- [More Thinking, Less Seeing? Assessing Amplified Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21523/) (2025)
- [Evaluating Step-by-step Reasoning Traces: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12289/) (2025)
- [Monitoring Monitorability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.18311/) (2025)
- [BigCharts-R1: Enhanced Chart Reasoning with Visual Reinforcement Finetuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09804/) (2025)
- [ChartQA-X: Generating Explanations for Visual Chart Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13275/) (2025)
- [SCI-Reason: A Dataset with Chain-of-Thought Rationales for Complex Multimodal Reasoning in Academic Areas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06637/) (2025)
- [Attention-guided Fine-tuning of Multimodal Large Language Models Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01558/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Chart reasoning agents are increasingly used to extract actionable insights in critical domains, achieving state-of-the-art performance on multiple benchmarks. Yet, high benchmark accuracy alone is insufficient for deployment, where stakeholders must be able to audit and verify how a model reaches its answer. Existing LVLM-based chart agents produce either answer-only predictions or free-form rationales that are hard to verify, obscuring whether an error arose from misreading the chart, extracting a wrong value, or miscomputing. We propose Chart-RVR, a reinforcement learning framework for training monitorable chart agents with verifiable process rewards. Chart-RVR decomposes chart reasoning into three auditable blocks: Structure, identifying the chart type; Evidence, reconstructing the underlying data table in JSON; and Derivation, exposing the stepwise trace that computes the answer. Across six in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks, Chart-RVR attains state-of-the-art accuracy among comparable-sized LVLMs. Beyond accuracy, we assess monitorability using a triangulated protocol that combines ground-truth surrogate metrics, an oracle information-gain measure, and an LLM-as-auditor scoring Process Verifiability and Evidence Localization, showing that Chart-RVR yields rationales that are markedly more verifiable and evidence-grounded than those from CoT prompting, SFT, and existing chart-specific baselines.