# Transferring Visual Explanations: How Cross-Architecture Knowledge Distillation Affects Model Interpretability

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23561 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.23561/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General knowledge distillation methods, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation.
- Builds on 8 of its 8 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Knowledge distillation / [General knowledge distillation methods](https://mlsanity.com/distill/general-knowledge-distillation-methods/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [Knowledge Distillation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05525/) (2020)
- [Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07258/) (2020)
- [Pruning by Explaining: A Novel Criterion for Deep Neural Network Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08881/) (2019)
- [When Does Pruning Benefit Vision Representations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01722/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deploying efficient neural networks is essential in resource-constrained environments, yet compact models often sacrifice interpretability - a critical in safety-critical domains such as autonomous driving and medicine. This study investigates whether Knowledge Distillation transfers the spatial feature attribution of a large teacher network to a compact student. To assess the influence of the KD scheme on interpretability, we distill a ResNet-152 teacher into a ResNet-34 student on ImageNet-1K across five configurations by systematically varying the distillation temperature and soft-label loss weight. Models are evaluated on top-1 accuracy, along with two interpretability metrics: Relevance Mass Accuracy and Relevance Rank Accuracy. These metrics are computed via Grad-CAM heatmaps benchmarked against ground-truth object masks. Our results show that top-1 accuracy ranges from 71.6% to 74.0%. For Grad-CAM, RMA ranges from 7.7% to 9.7% and RRA from 7.3% to 10.1%; for Guided Grad-CAM, RMA ranges from 16.1% to 18.6% and RRA from 15.9% to 21.5%. Interpretability proves far more sensitive to the soft-label weight than to the temperature: keeping the student anchored to hard labels preserves both accuracy and coarse localization, whereas weighting the teacher heavily degrades both. Fine-grained attribution, however, fell below the undistilled baseline in every configuration tested, indicating that logit distillation transmits where a model attends more readily than the pixel-level structure of that attention. We evaluate 12 cross-architecture combinations of convolutional and transformer-based models, revealing that the inheritance of fine-grained spatial reasoning is fundamentally bottlenecked by the student's intrinsic structural biases. To our knowledge, this is the first application of this interpretability-aware evaluation framework - previously used for neural network pruning - to KD.