# Feature Suppression and Differential Privacy for Residential Traffic Classification: A Two-Home Federated Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23521 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.23521/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06127/) (2018)
- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12101/) (2019)
- [FedFed: Feature Distillation against Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05077/) (2023)
- [Noise-Aware Algorithm for Heterogeneous Differentially Private Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03519/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Residential traffic classification supports service management, but learning across homes must account for heterogeneous traffic and privacy constraints. Privacy-aware training may impose uneven costs across traffic categories. We study this tradeoff in simulated two-client federated learning using 1.62 million preprocessed gateway-collected flows across six categories. We compare a full-feature baseline, feature suppression (FS), and differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) under one fixed record-level privacy setting. FS-mild excludes four timing features from 16 model inputs; it provides no formal privacy guarantee. With size-proportional aggregation, FS-mild achieves higher combined macro-F1 and worst-group F1 (the minimum per-class F1 across homes) than DP-SGD in all five seeds at both model capacities under stratified and temporal splits. The tested DP-SGD configuration incurs pronounced minority-category losses, especially in the smaller home, but FS-mild does not uniformly improve on the full-feature baseline. On stratified-split models, loss-based and shadow-model membership probes show near-chance aggregate discrimination without a consistent ranking across probes; this does not establish equivalent privacy. These findings support FS as an input-minimization baseline, not a substitute for formal privacy.