# ProcessLight: Process Supervision for Large Language Model Based Traffic Signal Control

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22746 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.22746/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Chain-of-thought reasoning for driving, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Chain-of-thought reasoning for driving](https://mlsanity.com/lr/chain-of-thought-reasoning-for-driving/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19348/) (2026)
- [R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-wise Group Relative Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12937/) (2025)
- [VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01679/) (2024)
- [CoLight: Learning Network-level Cooperation for Traffic Signal Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05717/) (2019)
- [CityFlow: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Environment for Large Scale City Traffic Scenario](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.05217/) (2019)
- [A Survey on Traffic Signal Control Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08117/) (2019)
- [LLMLight: Large Language Models as Traffic Signal Control Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.16044/) (2023)
- [AttendLight: Universal Attention-Based Reinforcement Learning Model for Traffic Signal Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05772/) (2020)
- [Efficient Pressure: Improving efficiency for signalized intersections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02336/) (2021)
- [Traffic-R1: Reinforced LLMs Bring Human-Like Reasoning to Traffic Signal Control Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02344/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently been introduced into traffic signal control (TSC) as decision agents due to their strengths in human-readable reasoning generation. Yet, existing LLM TSC methods optimize only from final outcomes and fail to distinguish valid from flawed reasoning steps, causing useful or misleading steps to be jointly updated and thus impairing the model's learning of effective reasoning. To bridge this gap, we propose an LLM-based framework ProcessLight to decompose signal decisions into verifiable semantic steps. Building on ProcessLight, we further develop Step-wise Traffic Process Policy Optimization (STeP-PO), a novel reinforcement learning framework that optimizes structured reasoning processes through step-level credit assignment. Specifically, STeP-PO uses step quality scores to evaluate local reasoning quality and step importance to measure each step's influence on the final action, and then assigns step-level advantages over a semantic step tree structure. The resulting step-level advantages are propagated to reasoning tokens, enabling fine-grained policy optimization beyond outcome-only rewards. Extensive experiments over multiple real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of our methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/wenzhaoabc/processlight.
