# ALPINE: Adaptive Localization for Parameter- and Sample-Efficient Few-Shot Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22323 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.22323/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 7 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.03400/) (2017)
- [Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.05175/) (2017)
- [Spatial Transformer Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02025/) (2015)
- [Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.06025/) (2017)
- [A Closer Look at Few-shot Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.04232/) (2019)
- [Gabor Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.01450/) (2017)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Few-shot learning research is predominantly evaluated on accuracy alone, with limited attention to the parameter and training-sample budgets required to reach that accuracy - a real constraint for practitioners without large-scale compute. We present an ultra-lightweight (22,249-34,917 parameter) spatial-relational architecture for few-shot image classification that combines fixed Gabor edge-energy guidance with a windowed, content-adaptive patch locator. Under a strictly matched, iso-episode-budget protocol (250 meta-training episodes, 5 canonical seeds, 600 evaluation episodes per seed), our architecture achieves 5-shot accuracy gains, consistent across all five seeds, over Prototypical Networks, Relation Networks, and MAML on both CIFAR-FS and MiniImageNet, while using 27-53% fewer parameters than any baseline. It also converges in fewer training episodes, generalizes better to an unseen fine-grained domain (CUB-200-2011 birds, zero retraining), and is more robust to 50% occlusion and 25% spatial translation than all three baselines. A series of falsification ablations - zeroing relational tokens at inference and retraining without them entirely - shows that the architecture's pairwise relational computation, while present, is not the primary driver of its performance; the content-adaptive patch locator is. We report this honestly, together with a capacity sweep showing a genuine accuracy plateau near 22-35k parameters, and release full seed-level results and checkpoint hashes for reproducibility.