# Brain-to-Image Generation: Reconstructing Visual Stimuli from EEG using Generative Adversarial Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22282 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.22282/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Adversarial Diffusion Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17042/) (2023)
- [EEGNet: A Compact Convolutional Network for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.08024/) (2016)
- [Decoding Natural Images from EEG for Object Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.13234/) (2023)
- [Visual Decoding and Reconstruction via EEG Embeddings with Guided Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07721/) (2024)
- [Deep Learning Human Mind for Automated Visual Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.00344/) (2016)
- [Decoding Brain Representations by Multimodal Learning of Neural Activity and Visual Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.10974/) (2018)
- [Bridging the Vision-Brain Gap with an Uncertainty-Aware Blur Prior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04207/) (2025)
- [Training on the test set? An analysis of Spampinato et al. [31]](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.07697/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reconstructing visual stimuli from electroencephalography (EEG) is difficult because scalp measurements have high temporal but limited spatial resolution, and paired EEG-image datasets remain small relative to modern generative-model training corpora. We present a reproducible single-subject baseline on THINGS-EEG2 that first tests the more defensible question of whether EEG can retrieve the viewed stimulus in a visual embedding space. A compact temporal-spatial convolutional encoder maps repetition-averaged EEG (63 by 250) to provided 512-dimensional ViT-B/32 image features. Model selection uses a concept-disjoint validation split, and final evaluation uses the official 200-image, 200-concept test gallery. Across three training seeds, the model obtains 12.83 +/- 0.58%, 39.17 +/- 1.76%, and 58.00 +/- 1.73% image recall at 1, 5, and 10 (mean +/- sample standard deviation), compared with analytical chance levels of 0.5%, 2.5%, and 5.0%. A session-balanced ablation shows that averaging more test repetitions generally improves ranking. Applying the Subject 01 model to the other nine subjects without adaptation causes a sharp performance drop, exposing subject specificity. We further report exploratory stress tests of direct conditional generators trained without external visual weights: single-subject and ten-subject variants produce noise-dominated outputs, with early validation improvements reversing after one to four epochs. Finally, we distinguish direct reconstruction from semantic rendering with a pretrained diffusion prior. The results support above-chance coarse semantic decoding under a closed-set, repetition-averaged protocol, but do not support faithful recovery of stimulus pixels.