# ExpBoN: Exponential-Noise Best-of-n for Efficient Test-Time LLM Alignment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.21899 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.21899/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 35 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [LLM preference optimization methods](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/llm-preference-optimization-methods/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10760/) (2022)
- [Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12122/) (2024)
- [Scalable Best-of-N Selection for Large Language Models via Self-Certainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18581/) (2025)
- [Theoretical guarantees on the best-of-n alignment policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01879/) (2024)
- [Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00045/) (2022)
- [BoNBoN Alignment for Large Language Models and the Sweetness of Best-of-n Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00832/) (2024)
- [Fast Best-of-N Decoding via Speculative Rejection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20290/) (2024)
- [Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding for Efficient LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19324/) (2025)
- [Is Best-of-N the Best of Them? Coverage, Scaling, and Optimality in Inference-Time Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21878/) (2025)
- [A Review of the Gumbel-max Trick and its Extensions for Discrete Stochasticity in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01515/) (2021)
- [Evaluation of Best-of-N Sampling Strategies for Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12668/) (2025)
- [Soft Best-of-n Sampling for Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03156/) (2025)
- [Regularized Best-of-N Sampling with Minimum Bayes Risk Objective for Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01054/) (2024)
- [Permute-and-Flip: A new mechanism for differentially private selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12603/) (2020)
- [Permute-and-Flip: An optimally stable and watermarkable decoder for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05864/) (2024)
- [Best-of-N through the Smoothing Lens: KL Divergence and Regret Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05913/) (2025)
- [The Permute-and-Flip Mechanism is Identical to Report-Noisy-Max with Exponential Noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07260/) (2021)
- [Guided Speculative Inference for Efficient Test-Time Alignment of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04118/) (2025)
- [AdaBoN: Adaptive Best-of-N Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.12050/) (2025)
- [Universal Exact Compression of Differentially Private Mechanisms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20782/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Best-of-n (BoN) sampling is a simple yet effective inference-time alignment method, but hard maximization provides only coarse control over the trade-off between reward and distribution shift. Soft Best-of-n (Verdun et al. 2025) provides smoother control and converges to the optimal distribution associated with KL-regularized reward maximization. In this paper, we introduce ExpBoN, an alternative soft BoN method based on the exponential-noise report-noisy-max mechanism. It admits an exact finite-n decomposition, which yields exponentially fast convergence in total variation, expected reward, and both directions of KL divergence. We provide comprehensive theoretical analyses of its convergence and regret behavior. We further integrate ExpBoN into the guided speculative inference (GSI) framework (Geuter, Mroueh, and AlvarezMelis 2025), resulting in ExpGSI, for efficient reward-guided LLM alignment. ExpGSI yields substantial reductions in computational cost while maintaining comparable accuracy. Experiments on MATH500, MMLU-STEM, and Minerva Math with the Qwen2.5-Math and Qwen3 model families show that ExpGSI reduces estimated computation by 14%-39% across candidate budgets for Qwen2.5-Math and by up to 45% at n=16 for Qwen3. Overall, our results provide a theoretical and algorithmic foundation for exponential-noise BoN and efficient test-time LLM alignment.
