# On Repulsive and Attractive Teachers: Separating Correctness from Behavior in Self-Distillation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.21561 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.21561/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation.
- Builds on 25 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Knowledge distillation / [On-policy and self-distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/on-policy-and-self-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20783/) (2025)
- [On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13649/) (2023)
- [Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18734/) (2026)
- [Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20802/) (2026)
- [DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11456/) (2025)
- [Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19897/) (2026)
- [Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00674/) (2026)
- [Self-Distilled RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03128/) (2026)
- [REASONING GYM: Reasoning Environments for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24760/) (2025)
- [Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24472/) (2026)
- [OpenClaw-RL: Train Any Agent Simply by Talking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10165/) (2026)
- [Unifying Group-Relative and Self-Distillation Policy Optimization via Sample Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02288/) (2026)
- [RLCSD: Reinforcement Learning with Contrastive On-Policy Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.11709/) (2026)
- [Aligning Language Models from User Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.12273/) (2026)
- [Privileged, but Biased: How PI-Conditioned Teachers Break Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04794/) (2026)
- [Rebellious Student: Reversing Teacher Signals for Reasoning Exploration with Self-Distilled RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10781/) (2026)
- [Anti-Self-Distillation for Reasoning RL via Pointwise Mutual Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11609/) (2026)
- [CEPO: RLVR Self-Distillation using Contrastive Evidence Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19436/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Inductive Feedback for Mixed-Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35390/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

On-policy self-distillation provides dense, token-level supervision by conditioning a model on privileged information and distilling the resulting teacher distribution back into the model. However, privileged information can change not only what the teacher knows, but also how it behaves, entangling correctness-relevant learning signals with unintended behavioral shifts. We study this effect in reasoning tasks by contrasting attractive self-distillation, which moves the model toward a privileged teacher, with repulsive self-distillation, which moves it away from a privileged teacher. We find that both objectives can induce strong and opposing behavioral shifts: attraction suppresses exploratory reasoning and promotes shorter, more confident responses, whereas repulsion increases response length, can trigger unintended switches into a model's latent thinking mode, and ultimately becomes unstable. Motivated by these observations, we study contrastive self-distillation, which combines attraction toward a correct-solution-conditioned teacher with repulsion from an incorrect-solution-conditioned teacher. In contrast to prior work that combines such distillation signals with a GRPO objective, we isolate the self-distillation objective and study its behavior on its own. We find that the shared behavioral shifts of the two teachers largely cancel, leaving a token-level signal that more directly reflects correctness. Across non-thinking, instruct-only, and already-thinking models, this contrastive objective improves reasoning performance while maintaining stable response lengths.