# Tracing the Evidence Behind Zero-Shot Time-Series Forecasting: A Source-First Taxonomy and Audit Framework

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.21425 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.21425/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Unified Training of Universal Time Series Forecasting Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02592/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07820/) (2023)
- [Time-MoE: Billion-Scale Time Series Foundation Models with Mixture of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16040/) (2024)
- [GIFT-Eval: A Benchmark For General Time Series Forecasting Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10393/) (2024)
- [Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03004/) (2019)
- [TiRex: Zero-Shot Forecasting Across Long and Short Horizons with Enhanced In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23719/) (2025)
- [Large Models for Time Series and Spatio-Temporal Data: A Survey and Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10196/) (2023)
- [ChatTime: A Unified Multimodal Time Series Foundation Model Bridging Numerical and Textual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11376/) (2024)
- [LSTPrompt: Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Time Series Forecasters by Long-Short-Term Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16132/) (2024)
- [TS-RAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation based Time Series Foundation Models are Stronger Zero-Shot Forecaster](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07649/) (2025)
- [Rethinking Evaluation in the Era of Time Series Foundation Models: (Un)known Information Leakage Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13654/) (2025)
- [How Foundational are Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00742/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Zero-shot time-series forecasting (TSF) is often described as forecasting without target-specific parameter updates, but that training-status condition does not specify what evidence the system may use. A frozen language model prompted with serialized values, a time-series model pretrained on broad forecasting corpora, and a retrieval-augmented forecaster may all satisfy the no-update condition while drawing on different transferable evidence. This paper argues that zero-shot TSF should therefore be governed as an evidence-access claim. We propose a source-first taxonomy that separates three primary evidence sources---frozen LLM prior reuse, parametric time-series pretraining, and retrieval-augmented external memory---from the architectures that implement them. After the source is identified, four additional audit questions remain: task interface, forecast object and scoring, prediction-time context, and resource budget. The resulting agenda is to make zero-shot leaderboards auditable by reporting evidence boundaries and interface assumptions alongside scores, so that benchmark progress reflects transferable forecasting capability rather than undisclosed changes in context, memory, or budget.