# Ability-Residual Decoupled Modeling for Affective Cognitive Diagnosis

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.21214 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.21214/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05709/) (2020)
- [Supervised Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11362/) (2020)
- [Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07780/) (2020)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12359/) (2018)
- [Deep Knowledge Tracing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.05908/) (2015)
- [Neural Cognitive Diagnosis for Intelligent Education Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08733/) (2019)
- [Knowledge Tracing Machines: Factorization Machines for Knowledge Tracing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.03388/) (2018)
- [Self-supervised Graph Learning for Long-tailed Cognitive Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08169/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Cognitive diagnosis infers students' concept mastery from response logs. However, students' responses are not determined by mastery alone: non-cognitive factors such as emotion, engagement, and fatigue can also affect performance. Affective cognitive diagnosis therefore extends conventional cognitive diagnosis by incorporating affective states. Existing methods often assume that the cognitive diagnosis backbone has already explained ability, item, and concept effects, so the remaining errors can be attributed mainly to affect. We argue that this assumption can be insufficient in real educational data: item calibration bias, systematic concept bias, personalized student-concept deviations, and latent student-item matching can form stable cognitive residuals. Without an explicit modeling pathway, these residuals may leak into affective representations, producing affect contamination. To address this problem, we propose an ability-residual decoupled framework for affective cognitive diagnosis. The model first captures unmodeled cognitive residuals through student, item, concept, student-concept, and low-rank student-item components, and then uses an affective module to modulate guess/slip effects. A Q-matrix-constrained concept residual attention mechanism adaptively aggregates only item-relevant concept residuals. Experiments on ASSIST2017, ASSIST2012, ASSIST2009, and Junyi with six cognitive diagnosis backbones show response-prediction gains across the reported comparisons and generally improved affect alignment when affect labels are available. Ablation studies, leakage probes, principal component analysis visualization, long-tail analysis, and case studies further indicate that ability residuals absorb stable cognitive bias, reduce cognitive contamination in the affective branch, and enhance the robustness and predictive accuracy of cognitive diagnosis models.