# WiC is Not WSD: A Study on LLMs and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20593 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.20593/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.09121/) (2018)
- [GlossBERT: BERT for Word Sense Disambiguation with Gloss Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07245/) (2019)
- [Moving Down the Long Tail of Word Sense Disambiguation with Gloss-Informed Biencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.02590/) (2020)
- [WiC-TSV: An Evaluation Benchmark for Target Sense Verification of Words in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.15016/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Word Sense Disambiguation Capabilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08662/) (2025)
- [WiC = TSV = WSD: On the Equivalence of Three Semantic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.14352/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Word-in-Context (WiC) remains challenging for language models, despite recent progress on lexical-semantic tasks. We hypothesise that this difficulty arises not only from comparing two contextual uses of a word, but also from the absence of an explicit sense inventory that specifies the relevant level of semantic granularity. We evaluate open LLMs on WiC and traditional Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) under similar settings. We find that providing candidate senses, similar to what is done in traditional WSD, improves WiC performance in all settings. In general, explicit sense information helps models make more consistent and targeted judgements. Human evaluation further shows that many apparent WiC errors reflect label ambiguity or mismatches between model and annotator sense boundaries rather than simple failures of lexical understanding. In particular, results show that LLMs overthink the sense distinction often leading to errors based on overly fine-grained distinctions.