# AdaRepair-Mem: Adaptive Experience Orchestration for Repository-Level Program Repair

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20130 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.20130/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 49 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 49)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16291/) (2023)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07814/) (2022)
- [MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08560/) (2023)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10144/) (2023)
- [Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19413/) (2025)
- [CodeXGLUE: A Machine Learning Benchmark Dataset for Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04664/) (2021)
- [CodeSearchNet Challenge: Evaluating the State of Semantic Code Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.09436/) (2019)
- [Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08633/) (2021)
- [Active Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06983/) (2023)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [Agentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01489/) (2024)
- [AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05427/) (2024)
- [LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08468/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models for Software Engineering: Survey and Open Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03533/) (2023)
- [SWE-rebench: An Automated Pipeline for Task Collection and Decontaminated Evaluation of Software Engineering Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20411/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models Meet NL2Code: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09420/) (2022)
- [SWE-Search: Enhancing Software Agents with Monte Carlo Tree Search and Iterative Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20285/) (2024)
- [AriGraph: Learning Knowledge Graph World Models with Episodic Memory for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04363/) (2024)
- [CURE: Code-Aware Neural Machine Translation for Automatic Program Repair](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00073/) (2021)
- [SpecRover: Code Intent Extraction via LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.02232/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models for Code: Evolution, Benchmarking, and Future Trends](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10372/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent memory-augmented repository-level program repair methods reuse historical repair experiences to improve LLM-based issue resolution. However, our analysis reveals three limitations in existing repository-level memory retrieval. First, episodic memory is highly imbalanced across repositories, leaving low-resource repositories with little effective support. Second, more memory does not monotonically lead to higher repair success, suggesting that relevance, quality, and redundancy matter more than raw memory volume. Third, memory accumulation is phase-misaligned: repositories may contain many reproduction experiences but few patch or refinement experiences. To address these problems, we propose an adaptive experience retrieval framework for repository-level program repair. Our framework introduces coverage-aware retrieval, which falls back to cross-repository or repair-type-based memories when same-repository memory is insufficient; quality-aware selection, which ranks memories by relevance, historical utility, specificity, and redundancy; and stage-aware routing, which separates and retrieves memories for reproduction, localization, patch generation, patch refinement, and validation. Evaluated on SWE-Bench-Lite and SWE-Bench-Verified, the proposed framework improves repair performance on under-covered repositories, reduces noisy memory retrieval, and better supports failed-to-fixed patch refinement. Our results show that the key to memory-augmented repair is not simply accumulating more experiences, but retrieving the right experiences for the right repair context.