# CARE-VI: Conservative Adaptive Reliability Estimation for Value Improvement in Off-Policy Actor-Critic Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20098 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.20098/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 33 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL theory and sample complexity](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-theory-and-sample-complexity/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 33)

- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01474/) (2016)
- [Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.02971/) (2015)
- [Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09477/) (2018)
- [Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04779/) (2020)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.06461/) (2015)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06169/) (2021)
- [Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.02900/) (2018)
- [Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00949/) (2019)
- [A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06887/) (2017)
- [MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.13239/) (2020)
- [MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.05951/) (2020)
- [Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04621/) (2016)
- [Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10044/) (2017)
- [Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.06778/) (2016)
- [Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.06923/) (2018)
- [Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-Ensemble](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01548/) (2021)
- [Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05982/) (2021)
- [A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.11275/) (2019)
- [Randomized Prior Functions for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03335/) (2018)
- [Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Stochastic Ensemble Value Expansion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.01675/) (2018)
- [Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile Critics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04269/) (2020)
- [SUNRISE: A Simple Unified Framework for Ensemble Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04938/) (2020)
- [Uncertainty Weighted Actor-Critic for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.08140/) (2021)
- [Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.06487/) (2020)
- [Averaged-DQN: Variance Reduction and Stabilization for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.01929/) (2016)
- [Fully Parameterized Quantile Function for Distributional Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02140/) (2019)
- [The Uncertainty Bellman Equation and Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.05380/) (2017)
- [For SALE: State-Action Representation Learning for Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02451/) (2023)
- [An Analysis of Categorical Distributional Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08163/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable temporal-difference targets are central to off-policy actor-critic learning. Direct value improvement refines the next-state target with alternative actions, but the reliability of this refinement depends on how candidate actions are ranked, reviewed, and weighted. Noisy rankings may force premature candidate commitment, reusing selection scores may bias target valuation, and fixed enhancement weights may amplify weak evidence. To address these risks, we develop Conservative Adaptive Ranking and Screening (CARS), which retains an ordered candidate prefix within a preset budget and narrows it only when the observed boundary gap exceeds a disagreement-scaled uncertainty radius. Selector-Evaluator Value Assessment (SEVA) uses selector critics to order candidates and a separately parameterized evaluator critic to review the selected value, then caps the reviewed value at the selector reference. Dynamic Adaptive Risk-aware Enhancement (DARE) then regulates each residual correction using candidate reliability, the gap between selector and evaluator signals, and a finite stage factor. Together, CARS, SEVA, and DARE form CARE-VI, an evidence-regulated target construction framework that preserves the backbone interfaces for critic regression and actor updates. The analysis bounds the CARS boundary error, the SEVA selected-value overestimation, and the one-sided deviation of the DARE residual displacement from its population counterpart, and establishes fixed-policy recovery after the finite-stage perturbation ends. Experiments with SAC, TD3, and TD7 on four MuJoCo tasks show that CARE-VI achieves the highest mean return in all twelve settings. Grouped ablations and scalar diagnostics support the roles of the three components in improving target reliability.