# F2DR: A Fine-Grained Full-Pipeline Reward Framework for DeepSearch Workflows

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19827 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19827/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12845/) (2024)
- [Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18451/) (2024)
- [JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12784/) (2024)
- [Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02495/) (2025)
- [HelpSteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08673/) (2024)
- [Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01352/) (2025)
- [Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02078/) (2024)
- [RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Style](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16184/) (2024)
- [RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02387/) (2025)
- [RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01937/) (2025)
- [Chain-of-Agents: End-to-End Agent Foundation Models via Multi-Agent Distillation and Agentic RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13167/) (2025)
- [RMB: Comprehensively Benchmarking Reward Models in LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09893/) (2024)
- [SimpleQA Verified: A Reliable Factuality Benchmark to Measure Parametric Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.07968/) (2025)
- [SFR-DeepResearch: Towards Effective Reinforcement Learning for Autonomously Reasoning Single Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06283/) (2025)
- [RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03637/) (2025)
- [Atom-Searcher: Enhancing Agentic Deep Research via Fine-Grained Atomic Thought Reward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12800/) (2025)
- [MaskSearch: A Universal Pre-Training Framework to Enhance Agentic Search Capability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20285/) (2025)
- [O-Researcher: An Open Ended Deep Research Model via Multi-Agent Distillation and Agentic RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03743/) (2026)
- [DecEx-RAG: Boosting Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Decision and Execution Optimization via Process Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05691/) (2025)
- [GRAM-R2: Self-Training Generative Foundation Reward Models for Reward Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02492/) (2025)
- [Deep Research Pretraining via Predictive Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00432/) (2026)
- [ConsistRM: Improving Generative Reward Models via Consistency-Aware Self-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07484/) (2026)
- [ReflectRM: Boosting Generative Reward Models via Self-Reflection within a Unified Judgment Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.07506/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the widespread industrial deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs), DeepSearch has emerged as the dominant paradigm for resolving complex user queries. It typically operates through an iterative closed-loop workflow consisting of planning and reflection, information retrieval, and answer generation. However, existing reward models (RMs) and evaluation benchmarks are primarily designed for static single-turn tasks, failing to capture the full-pipeline complexity of DeepSearch workflows. To address this limitation, we propose F2DR, a fine-grained full-pipeline DeepSearch reward framework. F2DR evaluates DeepSearch workflows across three dimensions: Content, Trajectory, and Answer, enabling comprehensive process-level assessment. We further construct DeepSearch RM-Bench, a dedicated benchmark for evaluating RMs in DeepSearch scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate that F2DR achieves significantly higher evaluation consistency than self-evaluation-based baselines, while DeepSearch RM-Bench exhibits strong discriminative capability across existing open-source RMs. We will publicly release the complete DeepSearch RM-Bench dataset soon.