# Benchmarking MLLMs via Cognitive Expected Scene Graph for Safety-Critical Visual Negation Understanding

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19767 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19767/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08821/) (2021)
- [CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.5726/) (2014)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.08822/) (2016)
- [When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01936/) (2022)
- [MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04788/) (2024)
- [VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07566/) (2021)
- [Benchmarking and Improving Detail Image Caption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19092/) (2024)
- [Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand Negation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09425/) (2025)
- [FACTUAL: A Benchmark for Faithful and Consistent Textual Scene Graph Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17497/) (2023)
- [Learn "No" to Say "Yes" Better: Improving Vision-Language Models via Negations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20312/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models via Directed Scene Graph for Comprehensive Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08614/) (2024)
- [Know "No" Better: A Data-Driven Approach for Enhancing Negation Awareness in CLIP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10913/) (2025)
- [LingMess: Linguistically Informed Multi Expert Scorers for Coreference Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12644/) (2022)
- [CAPability: A Comprehensive Visual Caption Benchmark for Evaluating Both Correctness and Thoroughness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14914/) (2025)
- [SC-Captioner: Improving Image Captioning with Self-Correction by Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06125/) (2025)
- [Bringing CLIP to the Clinic: Dynamic Soft Labels and Negation-Aware Learning for Medical Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22079/) (2025)
- [CompCap: Improving Multimodal Large Language Models with Composite Captions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05243/) (2024)
- [TNG-CLIP:Training-Time Negation Data Generation for Negation Awareness of CLIP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18434/) (2025)
- [Evaluating and Enhancing Negation Comprehension in Remote Sensing MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20177/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

True machine intelligence requires transcending passive pixel registration to master top-down functional reasoning over absent information via visual negation understanding. However, unconstrained visual negation paradigms remain overly open-ended, and pervasive affirmation bias causes both existing Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) and evaluation metrics to fail under negative semantics. To solve these intertwined challenges systematically, we first anchor the boundaries of negation reasoning within specific cognitive goals. Specifically, by focusing on safety as a highly pragmatic and critical cognitive dimension, we define the task of Scene Negation Understanding under Safety Cognition (SNUS). Under this framework, we construct a high-fidelity negative caption dataset mapping dense assertions of localized hazards. Concurrently, we propose the Cognitive Expected Scene Graph (CESG) Score, a structure-grounded, polarity-aware evaluation metric. Extensive experiments demonstrate that while current models struggle on the task, traditional metrics completely collapse under semantic reversals. Conversely, our framework delivers a solid benchmark for SNUS, providing a rigorous foundation to advance risk-aware situational comprehension and counterfactual cognition.
