# FINSKILLOPS: A Self-Evolving Multi-Agent System for SEC Filing QA

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19680 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19680/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04692/) (2024)
- [TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07624/) (2021)
- [FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11944/) (2023)
- [MinerU: An Open-Source Solution for Precise Document Content Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18839/) (2024)
- [ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03849/) (2022)
- [CoEvoSkills: Self-Evolving Agent Skills via Co-Evolutionary Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01687/) (2026)
- [AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01145/) (2026)
- [SkillForge: Forging Domain-Specific, Self-Evolving Agent Skills in Cloud Technical Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08618/) (2026)
- [MUSE-Autoskill: Self-Evolving Agents via Skill Creation, Memory, Management, and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27366/) (2026)
- [FinSage: A Multi-aspect RAG System for Financial Filings Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14493/) (2025)
- [SkillOps: Managing LLM Agent Skill Libraries as Self-Maintaining Software Ecosystems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13716/) (2026)
- [Enabling Self-Improving Agents to Learn at Test Time With Human-In-The-Loop Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17131/) (2025)
- [Fin-RATE: A Real-world Financial Analytics and Tracking Evaluation Benchmark for LLMs on SEC Filings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07294/) (2026)
- [SECQUE: A Benchmark for Evaluating Real-World Financial Analysis Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04596/) (2025)
- [FinDebate: Multi-Agent Collaborative Intelligence for Financial Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17395/) (2025)
- [VeritasFi: An Adaptable, Multi-tiered RAG Framework for Multi-modal Financial Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10828/) (2025)
- [Customized FinGPT Search Agents Using Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15284/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Financial QA systems are typically improved before deployment through better retrieval, prompting, or agent coordination, leaving their reliability behavior fixed thereafter. In practice, new SEC-filing questions repeatedly expose heterogeneous errors in period, entity, evidence use, and calculation. Existing self-improvement methods can turn failures into new behaviors, but offer limited control over where a correction should apply or which previously correct answers it may break. We therefore frame post-deployment improvement as controlled behavioral maintenance: recurring failures should become scoped skill patches, and each patch should earn deployment with- out introducing regressions. We instantiate this view in FINSKILLOPS, a multi-agent system for SEC filing QA. FINSKILLOPS derives reusable skills from evidence-grounded, typed failure diagnoses and governs them through targeted validation, protected-case regression checks, negative controls, and versioned replacement or retirement. Across six financial QA benchmarks, a single frozen skill registry achieves the highest verdict-weighted correctness and reference consistency among the evaluated systems. Evolved skills raise correctness from 3.70 to 4.55 on our enhanced benchmark. In a separate 12-round operational study, only six of 33 proposed skills are promoted, while the monitoring non-correct rate falls from 20.0% to 12.5%. These results establish controlled skill scope, admission, and lifecycle management as the foundation for reliable self-improvement.