# Conservation Buys Stability and Factoring Buys Counterfactuals in Physical World Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19674 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19674/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Latent predictive world models, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 31 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [Latent predictive world models](https://mlsanity.com/wm/latent-predictive-world-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12602/) (2022)
- [E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09844/) (2021)
- [Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09405/) (2020)
- [V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09985/) (2025)
- [Hamiltonian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01563/) (2019)
- [Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00222/) (2016)
- [CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01442/) (2019)
- [Lagrangian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.04630/) (2020)
- [Deep Lagrangian Networks: Using Physics as Model Prior for Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.04490/) (2019)
- [Symplectic ODE-Net: Learning Hamiltonian Dynamics with Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12077/) (2019)
- [Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08261/) (2021)
- [VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06800/) (2025)
- [Hamiltonian Generative Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.13789/) (2019)
- [Simplifying Hamiltonian and Lagrangian Neural Networks via Explicit Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.13581/) (2020)
- [Dissipative SymODEN: Encoding Hamiltonian Dynamics with Dissipation and Control into Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08860/) (2020)
- [Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks for Learning Explicit Time-Dependent Dynamical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.08024/) (2021)
- [Machine learning structure preserving brackets for forecasting irreversible processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12619/) (2021)
- [Dissipative Hamiltonian Neural Networks: Learning Dissipative and Conservative Dynamics Separately](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.10085/) (2022)
- [Benchmarking Energy-Conserving Neural Networks for Learning Dynamics from Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.02334/) (2020)
- [LEADS: Learning Dynamical Systems that Generalize Across Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04546/) (2021)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Lagrangian Dynamics from Images for Prediction and Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01926/) (2020)
- [Meta-Learning Dynamics Forecasting Using Task Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.10271/) (2021)
- ["PhyWorldBench": A Comprehensive Evaluation of Physical Realism in Text-to-Video Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13428/) (2025)
- [Extending Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Neural Networks with Differentiable Contact Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06794/) (2021)
- [Causal-JEPA: Learning World Models through Object-Level Latent Masking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11389/) (2026)
- [Which priors matter? Benchmarking models for learning latent dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.05458/) (2021)
- [Adaptable Hamiltonian neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.13235/) (2021)
- [Compositional Learning of Dynamical System Models Using Port-Hamiltonian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.00893/) (2022)
- [PhyGround: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in Generative World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10806/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

A learned simulator can reproduce its training conditions accurately yet fail in two distinct ways once those conditions change. Over long rollouts, small errors accumulate until the trajectory drifts away from physically plausible behavior; under an intervention on a physical parameter, the model may continue to follow the law seen during training rather than the intervened one. We show that these two failures require different structural remedies. Evolving a learned energy with a symplectic integrator preserves the geometry of the conservative dynamics and keeps rollouts bounded and physically meaningful for up to 100× the training horizon, while equal-capacity predictors, an energy-regularized predictor, and a tuned neural ODE diverge. By contrast, encoding the physical coupling through an explicit linear factorization enables the model to follow a never-seen sign of that coupling, whereas an unrestricted parameterization remains locked to the training law. Crucially, the two mechanisms are separable: removing the structure responsible for long-horizon stability leaves counterfactual transfer intact, while removing the factorized coupling destroys counterfactual transfer without eliminating stability. This double dissociation, established with matched controls that remove or replace one structural component at a time, persists beyond the headline three-body system and remains visible when the physical state must be inferred from pixels rather than provided directly. The result is a concrete design principle for physical world models: long-horizon stability and changed-law generalization arise from distinct structural commitments, and each can be imposed deliberately without requiring the other.
