# Full-Duplex Speech Models Take the Floor When Asked, Not When Needed

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19596 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.19596/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19348/) (2026)
- [Moshi: a speech-text foundation model for real-time dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00037/) (2024)
- [Freeze-Omni: A Smart and Low Latency Speech-to-speech Dialogue Model with Frozen LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00774/) (2024)
- [Generative Spoken Dialogue Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16502/) (2022)
- [Full-Duplex-Bench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Full-duplex Spoken Dialogue Models on Turn-taking Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04721/) (2025)
- [MiniCPM-o 4.5: Towards Real-Time Full-Duplex Omni-Modal Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.27393/) (2026)
- [Beyond Turn-Based Interfaces: Synchronous LLMs as Full-Duplex Dialogue Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15594/) (2024)
- [PersonaPlex: Voice and Role Control for Full Duplex Conversational Speech Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06053/) (2026)
- [Voice Activity Projection: Self-supervised Learning of Turn-taking Events](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09812/) (2022)
- [TurnGPT: a Transformer-based Language Model for Predicting Turn-taking in Spoken Dialog](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10874/) (2020)
- [Talking Turns: Benchmarking Audio Foundation Models on Turn-Taking Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01174/) (2025)
- [FD-Bench: A Full-Duplex Benchmarking Pipeline Designed for Full Duplex Spoken Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19040/) (2025)
- [FLEXI: Benchmarking Full-duplex Human-LLM Speech Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22243/) (2025)
- [Full-Duplex Interaction in Spoken Dialogue Systems: A Comprehensive Study from the ICASSP 2026 HumDial Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21406/) (2026)
- [Multi-Faceted Interactivity Alignment in Full-Duplex Speech Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.11167/) (2026)
- [Raon-Speech Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23912/) (2026)
- [Instruct-FD: Can Your Full-Duplex Speech System Follow Turn-Taking Instructions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20460/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Almost Human, Except When It Matters: VoxParity and the Decisions a Voice Should Change](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35922/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Full-duplex speech models listen and speak at once, promising always-on assistants. Yet they must also decide when they should speak. Human listeners speak when addressed or when the speaker stops, but also self-select to correct a false claim, supply a missing word, or warn of danger. We ask whether full-duplex models do the same. To separate the reason to speak from the opportunity, we construct context-matched English monologues in which only the trigger utterance varies within a topic, define 10 conditions from turn-allocation rules, and compress inter-word pauses to limit opportunities created by silence. Across five model families, being addressed and silence are far more reliable triggers than false facts or hazards. Frame-level text-token probabilities in Moshi and PersonaPlex are lower for false facts than for Neutral when averaged over the first 2,s after trigger end. Pauses or permission to interrupt do not close this gap either. Given the floor, Moshi and PersonaPlex answer most direct questions, yet the proportion of non-empty false-fact replies that challenge the claim is only .14--.15, and the proportion of hazard replies that warn of danger is .04--.07. This paper thus identifies a gap in both speech initiation and response content. Closing it requires genuine content understanding and intervention decisions grounded in it.