# Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Recognition of Sign Language Handshapes

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18772 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18772/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [MediaPipe: A Framework for Building Perception Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08172/) (2019)
- [Sign Language Transformers: Joint End-to-end Sign Language Recognition and Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.13830/) (2020)
- [Gloss-free Sign Language Translation: Improving from Visual-Language Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14768/) (2023)
- [Skeleton Aware Multi-modal Sign Language Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.08833/) (2021)
- [Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08597/) (2019)
- [YouTube-ASL: A Large-Scale, Open-Domain American Sign Language-English Parallel Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15162/) (2023)
- [YouTube-SL-25: A Large-Scale, Open-Domain Multilingual Sign Language Parallel Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11144/) (2024)
- [Considerations for meaningful sign language machine translation based on glosses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15464/) (2022)
- [SHuBERT: Self-Supervised Sign Language Representation Learning via Multi-Stream Cluster Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16765/) (2024)
- [The Sem-Lex Benchmark: Modeling ASL Signs and Their Phonemes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00196/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Sign language processing advances rapidly for high-resource languages such as American Sign Language (ASL), yet most of the world's sign languages lack the phonological annotations new methods require. We present the first zero-shot cross-lingual framework for handshape recognition, transferring from ASL to Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Our approach leverages the decomposition of handshapes into five phonological features -- selected fingers, flexion, spread, thumb position, and thumb contact -- shared across both languages, to decode LSC handshapes from predicted features via a composite phonological distance metric. We evaluate three architectures (MLP, SL-GCN, SHuBERT) trained on two ASL corpora (PopSign, Sem-Lex) against a 37-handshape, single-signer LSC benchmark. Zero-shot transfer proves viable once recording-format disparities are harmonized, reaching 80.0% phonological feature accuracy and 54.5% expected handshape accuracy. Phonological decomposition thus offers a bridge for extending sign language technologies to low-resource languages without any target-language video training labels.