# ActionPiece: Rethinking Action Tokenization for Autoregressive Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18487 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18487/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Efficient VLA inference and adaptation, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models.
- Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Vision-language-action models / [Efficient VLA inference and adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/vla/efficient-vla-inference-and-adaptation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Neural Discrete Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00937/) (2017)
- [RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15818/) (2023)
- [OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09246/) (2024)
- [Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.01144/) (2016)
- [π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24164/) (2024)
- [LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03310/) (2023)
- [ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.02054/) (2019)
- [RDT-1B: a Diffusion Foundation Model for Bimanual Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07864/) (2024)
- [BridgeData V2: A Dataset for Robot Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12952/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Real-World Robot Manipulation Policies in Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05941/) (2024)
- [TraceVLA: Visual Trace Prompting Enhances Spatial-Temporal Awareness for Generalist Robotic Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10345/) (2024)
- [LIBERO-Plus: In-depth Robustness Analysis of Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13626/) (2025)
- [LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08544/) (2025)
- [Knowledge Insulating Vision-Language-Action Models: Train Fast, Run Fast, Generalize Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23705/) (2025)
- [Magma: A Foundation Model for Multimodal AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13130/) (2025)
- [StarVLA: A Lego-like Codebase for Vision-Language-Action Model Developing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05014/) (2026)
- [Actions as Language: Fine-Tuning VLMs into VLAs Without Catastrophic Forgetting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22195/) (2025)
- [Fast-in-Slow: A Dual-System Foundation Model Unifying Fast Manipulation within Slow Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01953/) (2025)
- [FASTer: Toward Efficient Autoregressive Vision Language Action Modeling via Neural Action Tokenization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.04952/) (2025)
- [ActionCodec: What Makes for Good Action Tokenizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15397/) (2026)
- [Evo-Depth: A Lightweight Depth-Enhanced Vision-Language-Action Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14950/) (2026)
- [OAT: Ordered Action Tokenization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04215/) (2026)
- [X-Tokenizer: A Multimodal Action Tokenizer for Vision-Language-Action Pretraining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.14752/) (2026)
- [Ordered Action Tokens for Visuomotor Policy Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.21670/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Action tokenizers play a central role in autoregressive vision-language-action (VLA) models, determining both the targets for policy training and the executable commands recovered from predicted tokens. Their fidelity is commonly evaluated using pointwise reconstruction metrics such as mean squared error (MSE), yet small individual errors do not fully characterize how faithfully action adjustments across demonstrations are preserved. After compression, similar actions may still cluster around a representative motion, while the adjustments needed for different contexts are diminished, distorted, or even reversed. We introduce physical rank consistency (PRC) to measure how well tokenization preserves local physical distance rankings after reconstruction. Evaluating decoded actions provides a common reference across token vocabularies and decoder architectures, complementing pointwise accuracy with a measure of relational fidelity. We further present ActionPiece, which preserves physical action relationships through joint supervision of representation learning and quantization. Physical rank preservation supervises near-far ordering in encoder and quantized feature distances, while quantization regularization applies the same ordering to codeword assignment distributions. Both objectives augment reconstruction, producing discrete action tokens for standard autoregressive policy learning and execution through a frozen decoder. Under the same Qwen3-VL-4B policy training setup, ActionPiece achieves 94.8% on LIBERO and 68.8% on unseen LIBERO-Plus, with additional evaluations reaching 71.9% on SimplerEnv and 51.5% across VLA-Arena L0-L2. Component ablations show that the two objectives jointly improve PRC and policy success, demonstrating the value of physical relationship supervision for action tokenization.