# Unified Response Geometry for Structured Pruning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18239 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18239/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 34 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 34)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.04381/) (2018)
- [A ConvNet for the 2020s](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03545/) (2022)
- [Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.00149/) (2015)
- [The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03635/) (2018)
- [Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02626/) (2015)
- [Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.08710/) (2016)
- [SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00774/) (2023)
- [SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02340/) (2018)
- [A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11695/) (2023)
- [Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06168/) (2017)
- [Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.06519/) (2017)
- [LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11627/) (2023)
- [Rethinking the Value of Network Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.05270/) (2018)
- [Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.03665/) (2016)
- [Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10771/) (2019)
- [Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05467/) (2020)
- [Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07376/) (2020)
- [ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06342/) (2017)
- [Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07683/) (2020)
- [AMC: AutoML for Model Compression and Acceleration on Mobile Devices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03494/) (2018)
- [Filter Pruning via Geometric Median for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Acceleration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00250/) (2018)
- [Soft Filter Pruning for Accelerating Deep Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.06866/) (2018)
- [HRank: Filter Pruning using High-Rank Feature Map](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10179/) (2020)
- [NISP: Pruning Networks using Neuron Importance Score Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05908/) (2017)
- [MetaPruning: Meta Learning for Automatic Neural Network Channel Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.10258/) (2019)
- [Network Trimming: A Data-Driven Neuron Pruning Approach towards Efficient Deep Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.03250/) (2016)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Structured pruning is commonly formulated as ranking individual channels, although channel responses can be complementary or cancel through downstream mixing. Motivated by these response interactions, we formulate pruning as the selection of a subset with large joint response capacity, followed by a separate functional realization step. Our unified response geometry maps each candidate set to (M(D,R)=D1/2RD1/2) and uses its determinant together with Schur-greedy residuals to select non-redundant coordinates. The same construction yields two information-conditioned instances: an unlabeled instance based on activation covariance, and a task-conditioned instance that combines activation and gradient variance for response scale with gradient correlation for complementarity. To convert the selected subset into an executable network, we fold predictable removed responses into successor weights through ridge compensation and recalibrate batch-normalization statistics, without fine-tuning the network. On ImageNet ResNet-50, the unlabeled instance reaches (65.4%) and (53.9%) Top-1 accuracy at 30% and 40% deletion, versus (59.8%) and (43.1%) for strength-only selection; the task-conditioned instance reaches (67.7%) and (56.3%) under the same protocol. A six-family screen shows architecture-dependent behavior, with positive relative contrasts in several convolutional and expansion-layer settings and clear boundary cases in windowed attention. These results support response geometry as a conditional principle for structured pruning, with its benefit determined jointly by the observed response and the architecture in which that response is realized.