# OBC-Prune: Outcome-Based Calibration for Large Reasoning Model Pruning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17890 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.17890/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.17323/) (2022)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00774/) (2023)
- [Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08935/) (2023)
- [A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11695/) (2023)
- [LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11627/) (2023)
- [Sheared LLaMA: Accelerating Language Model Pre-training via Structured Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06694/) (2023)
- [Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07683/) (2020)
- [Optimal Brain Compression: A Framework for Accurate Post-Training Quantization and Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.11580/) (2022)
- [Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00674/) (2026)
- [Thought Anchors: Which LLM Reasoning Steps Matter?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19143/) (2025)
- [ALPS: Improved Optimization for Highly Sparse One-Shot Pruning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07831/) (2024)
- [Beware of Calibration Data for Pruning Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17711/) (2024)
- [From LLMs to LRMs: Rethinking Pruning for Reasoning-Centric Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18091/) (2026)
- [Quantized Reasoning Models Think They Need to Think Longer, but They Do Not](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00206/) (2026)
- [Thinking Sparks!: Emergent Attention Heads in Reasoning Models During Post Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25758/) (2025)
- [Think Before You Prune: Self-Reflective Structured Pruning for Reasoning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02185/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Models Can be Accurately Pruned Via Chain-of-Thought Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.12464/) (2025)
- [Think Before You Prune: Selective Self-Generated Calibration for Pruning Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18864/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Unlocking Structured Pruning for Reasoning Language Models via Attention-Preserving MLP Trimming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19121/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large reasoning models (LRMs) generate long chain-of-thought traces before answering, creating significant inference overhead. Pruning can reduce this cost, but its effectiveness depends on the calibration data used to estimate parameter importance. Recent work calibrates on the model's own rollouts instead of generic dataset, but treats all reasoning tokens uniformly, regardless of whether they contribute to successful reasoning. As a result, pruning protects weights by statistical salience rather than by their contribution to correct reasoning, so weights behind erroneous computation survive as readily as those behind correct computation. These erroneous patterns then get carried into the pruned model, degrading reasoning quality, producing both lower accuracy and longer reasoning traces. We propose Outcome-Based Calibration for Large Reasoning Model Pruning (OBC-Prune) to close this gap. OBC first constructs difficulty-matched pairs of correct and incorrect rollouts from problems the model answers inconsistently. It then estimates the causal importance of each reasoning sentence through intervention-based analysis, quantifying how removing its influence affects subsequent predictions. These causal importance scores are converted into per-token weights that rescale the calibration activations used by one-shot pruning methods (SparseGPT, Wanda, ALPS), without modifying the underlying pruning algorithms. Experiments on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen 1.5B, 7B, and 14B models at 40% and 50% sparsity demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art calibration baselines across most model sizes and sparsity levels on MATH500, LiveCodeBench, and AIME 2025. These results indicate that preserving causally important reasoning circuits is a substantially more effective pruning objective than uniformly preserving observed activations.