# Can VLMs Reliably Assess Sidewalk Accessibility Attributes from Pedestrian-Level Imagery?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17882 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.17882/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 38 of its 87 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18265/) (2025)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)
- [How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16821/) (2024)
- [Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13063/) (2023)
- [Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11324/) (2023)
- [Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14975/) (2023)
- [Conformalized Quantile Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.03222/) (2019)
- [Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coverage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.02544/) (2020)
- [Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.00451/) (2016)
- [A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08298/) (2023)
- [Conformal Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10193/) (2023)
- [Language Models with Conformal Factuality Guarantees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10978/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Open Research Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05563/) (2024)
- [Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09714/) (2024)
- [VL-Uncertainty: Detecting Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Model via Uncertainty Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.11919/) (2024)
- [API Is Enough: Conformal Prediction for Large Language Models Without Logit-Access](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01216/) (2024)
- [Overconfidence is Key: Verbalized Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language and Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02917/) (2024)
- [Conformal Prediction for Natural Language Processing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01976/) (2024)
- [Uncertainty-Aware Evaluation for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14418/) (2024)
- [Conformal Prediction: A Data Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06494/) (2024)
- [SConU: Selective Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14154/) (2025)
- [Learning Conformal Abstention Policies for Adaptive Risk Management in Large Language and Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06884/) (2025)
- [Too Consistent to Detect: A Study of Self-Consistent Errors in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17656/) (2025)
- [Conformal Prediction for Zero-Shot Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24693/) (2025)
- [Are foundation models for computer vision good conformal predictors?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06082/) (2024)
- [Full Conformal Adaptation of Medical Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06076/) (2025)
- [LLMs are Overconfident: Evaluating Confidence Interval Calibration with FermiEval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26995/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

An important component of urban accessibility, particularly for wheelchair users and people with reduced mobility, is sidewalk compliance with measurable requirements. We test whether effective width, longitudinal slope, cross slope, and pavement condition can be assessed reliably from pedestrian-level imagery using vision-language models (VLMs). We present the first application of sampling-based conformal prediction (CP) for VLM-based accessibility assessment. We evaluate four VLMs on 514 sidewalk images from Seoul, South Korea, with field-measured ground truth. Conformal calibration attains the nominal 90% coverage for all models and attributes, but the calibrated regions differ in informativeness. Effective width yields the most informative estimates, with a mean interval half-width of about 1.0 m for the best model. Since every model overestimates width, asymmetric calibration shortens the intervals by up to 33% at unchanged coverage. Longitudinal slope is marginally informative, cross-slope intervals are too wide to resolve regulatory thresholds, and pavement-condition sets degenerate to all five grades (A-E) for three of the four models. Uncalibrated intervals from raw sampling dispersion cover only 17-47% of field-measured values at a nominal 90% level. Among the images with the most self-consistent responses, these intervals miss the field-measured value in up to 96% of cases. Response self-consistency is therefore not evidence of accuracy, and sampling dispersion cannot be interpreted as uncertainty until it has been calibrated against field-measured ground truth. No quantitative attribute reaches the precision required for general compliance assessment, but CP identifies from calibration data alone which attributes can support screening of segments far from the thresholds. We release the annotated pedestrian-level images and their corresponding field-measured attribute values.