# Spurious Tool Use: When RL Agents Learn the Wrong Reason to Act

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16268 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16268/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Reinforcement learning for LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/reinforcement-learning-for-llm-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [Invariant Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02893/) (2019)
- [Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.09516/) (2025)
- [Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08731/) (2019)
- [Search-o1: Agentic Search-Enhanced Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05366/) (2025)
- [ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11536/) (2025)
- [Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02937/) (2022)
- [R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05592/) (2025)
- [DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11456/) (2025)
- [ZeroSearch: Incentivize the Search Capability of LLMs without Searching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04588/) (2025)
- [ART: Automatic multi-step reasoning and tool-use for large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09014/) (2023)
- [Correct-N-Contrast: A Contrastive Approach for Improving Robustness to Spurious Correlations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.01517/) (2022)
- [ToRL: Scaling Tool-Integrated RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23383/) (2025)
- [ReSearch: Learning to Reason with Search for LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19470/) (2025)
- [SimpleTIR: End-to-End Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Turn Tool-Integrated Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02479/) (2025)
- [VerlTool: Towards Holistic Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01055/) (2025)
- [StepSearch: Igniting LLMs Search Ability via Step-Wise Proximal Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15107/) (2025)
- [Acting Less is Reasoning More! Teaching Model to Act Efficiently](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14870/) (2025)
- [Reinforcing Multi-Turn Reasoning in LLM Agents via Fine-Grained Reward Structure and Credit Assignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11821/) (2025)
- [In-the-Flow Agentic System Optimization for Effective Planning and Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05592/) (2025)
- [Agent RL Scaling Law: Agent RL with Spontaneous Code Execution for Mathematical Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07773/) (2025)
- [Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18322/) (2025)
- [Reducing Cognitive Overhead in Tool Use via Multi-Small-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.08882/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly interleave natural language reasoning with external tools such as web search and code execution. These tool-use policies are often optimized via reinforcement learning (RL), which can amplify spurious correlations in the training data. In this work, we study when and why RL-trained agents learn shortcut tool-selection policies: invoking tools based on superficial prompt cues rather than genuine task requirements. We construct controlled synthetic environments combining factual question answering and mathematical reasoning tasks, and inject cues that are strongly correlated with specific tools during training but causally irrelevant to tool necessity. Across counterfactual evaluations where cues are present but the associated tools are not required, agents exhibit substantial shortcut behavior, with spurious tool invocation rates increasing by up to 39 percent. However, shortcut formation is not universal: across the conditions we test, it arises only when the agent has already learned to use the target tool reliably, suggesting that task competence, rather than dataset imbalance alone, is a key factor in shortcut learning. A swapped-cue analysis further shows that semantic alignment between cues and tools substantially amplifies this effect. To mitigate these failures, we introduce a dense, decision-level reward in which an LLM judge evaluates the necessity of each tool call. This tool-necessity reward effectively suppresses cue-driven tool use while preserving task performance, providing a practical approach to improving the robustness of LLM agent tool-use policies.