# RESKILL: Explicit Failure Attribution and Structured Repair for Interactive Language Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15684 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15684/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Tool learning and function calling](https://mlsanity.com/agents/tool-learning-and-function-calling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07753/) (2022)
- [ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03768/) (2020)
- [Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05608/) (2022)
- [MineDojo: Building Open-Ended Embodied Agents with Internet-Scale Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08853/) (2022)
- [Describe, Explain, Plan and Select: Interactive Planning with Large Language Models Enables Open-World Multi-Task Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01560/) (2023)
- [SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12670/) (2026)
- [CoEvoSkills: Self-Evolving Agent Skills via Co-Evolutionary Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01687/) (2026)
- [AgentGym: Evolving Large Language Model-based Agents across Diverse Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04151/) (2024)
- [SKILL0: In-Context Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Skill Internalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.02268/) (2026)
- [Large Language Models Can Self-Improve At Web Agent Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20309/) (2024)
- [SkillForge: Forging Domain-Specific, Self-Evolving Agent Skills in Cloud Technical Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08618/) (2026)
- [SKILLFOUNDRY: Building Self-Evolving Agent Skill Libraries from Heterogeneous Scientific Resources](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03964/) (2026)
- [SkillGen: Verified Inference-Time Agent Skill Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10999/) (2026)
- [EffiLearner: Enhancing Efficiency of Generated Code via Self-Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15189/) (2024)
- [SkillCraft: Can LLM Agents Learn to Use Tools Skillfully?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00718/) (2026)
- [Prune-OPD: Efficient and Reliable On-Policy Distillation for Long-Horizon Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07804/) (2026)
- [Odyssey: Empowering Minecraft Agents with Open-World Skills](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15325/) (2024)
- [Uncertainty-Aware Clarification in LLM Agents with Information Gain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03135/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Language agents increasingly rely on reusable skills, but post-failure repair is often handled by opaque one-shot reflection: a model generates a skill patch without explicitly maintaining how failure explanations relate to candidate repairs or how unsuccessful retests should influence later edits. We introduce RESKILL, a structured repair framework that maintains an explicit repair state across repair rounds. Given a failed rollout, the framework links failure hypotheses to candidate skill patches, selects local repairs through coverage-based attribution, retests the edited skill set in the environment, and uses retest outcomes to guide subsequent repair updates. The language model supplies structured repair factors, while the repair procedure records them, compares local skill patches by how well they address active failure explanations, and carries unsuccessful retest outcomes into later repair rounds. We evaluate RESKILL on ALFWorld and TextCraft across three model sizes under fixed repair budgets. RESKILL obtains the strongest final success in all six benchmark-model settings, improving average final success by 3.7 percentage points over direct repair and 3.3 points over hypothesis-conditioned repair. These results suggest that explicit attribution alone is insufficient; durable improvement emerges when attribution is integrated with repair selection and persistent retest-conditioned update.