# VisInteract: Towards Dynamic Interactive Text-to-Visualization under Imperfect Queries

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15182 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15182/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14992/) (2023)
- [Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03111/) (2023)
- [Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04406/) (2023)
- [Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01030/) (2024)
- [Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01535/) (2024)
- [Accessing GPT-4 level Mathematical Olympiad Solutions via Monte Carlo Tree Self-refine with LLaMa-3 8B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07394/) (2024)
- [Mutual Reasoning Makes Smaller LLMs Stronger Problem-Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06195/) (2024)
- [LIDA: A Tool for Automatic Generation of Grammar-Agnostic Visualizations and Infographics using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02927/) (2023)
- [NL4DV: A Toolkit for Generating Analytic Specifications for Data Visualization from Natural Language Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.10723/) (2020)
- [ChartGPT: Leveraging LLMs to Generate Charts from Abstract Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.01920/) (2023)
- [Chat2VIS: Generating Data Visualisations via Natural Language using ChatGPT, Codex and GPT-3 Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02094/) (2023)
- [VisEval: A Benchmark for Data Visualization in the Era of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00981/) (2024)
- [Model-based Interactive Semantic Parsing: A Unified Framework and A Text-to-SQL Case Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.05389/) (2019)
- [Data Formulator: AI-powered Concept-driven Visualization Authoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10094/) (2023)
- [Collecting and Characterizing Natural Language Utterances for Specifying Data Visualizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00680/) (2021)
- [nvAgent: Automated Data Visualization from Natural Language via Collaborative Agent Workflow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05036/) (2025)
- [Natural Language Dataset Generation Framework for Visualizations Powered by Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10245/) (2023)
- [Marrying Dialogue Systems with Data Visualization: Interactive Data Visualization Generation from Natural Language Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16013/) (2023)
- [MultiVis-Agent: A Multi-Agent Framework with Logic Rules for Reliable and Comprehensive Cross-Modal Data Visualization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18320/) (2026)
- [Towards Robustness of Text-to-Visualization Translation against Lexical and Phrasal Variability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07135/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Real-world visualization requests are routinely ambiguous, incomplete, or factually incorrect, yet existing Text-to-Visualization (Text-to-Vis) systems assume well-specified inputs and produce charts in a single pass. When queries are imperfect, a system must interact with the user to recover the true intent, but no benchmark or method supports this dynamic process. We introduce VisInteract, a new paradigm that reframes Text-to-Vis as interaction-driven intent recovery, and VisInteract-Bench, to our knowledge, that is the first benchmark for dynamic interactive Text-to-Vis, featuring controlled imperfection injection, a leakage-controlled User Agent for realistic multi-turn feedback, and dual-perspective (code and chart) automated evaluation. On the algorithmic side, we propose Vis-MCTS, a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) enhanced method, introducing improvements over classical MCTS, that Progressive Widening to tame the unbounded tool-argument space in tree search, cross-rollout information sharing so clarifications and critiques benefit the entire search tree, and Dimension-Aware Reward Decomposition that routes scalar user feedback along data-fidelity, visual-design, and intent-alignment dimensions to resolve credit assignment across heterogeneous actions. Extensive Experiments across two LLM backbones show that Vis-MCTS consistently outperforms all Text-to-Vis baselines, improving end-to-end task success by 13.40%--16.27% over the strongest interactive baseline and by more than 5× over non-interactive ones.