# Horizon-specific Expert Fusion for Photovoltaic Power Forecasting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15035 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.15035/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14730/) (2022)
- [iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06625/) (2023)
- [Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07815/) (2024)
- [N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10437/) (2019)
- [A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10688/) (2023)
- [TimeMixer: Decomposable Multiscale Mixing for Time Series Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14616/) (2024)
- [TimeXer: Empowering Transformers for Time Series Forecasting with Exogenous Variables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19072/) (2024)
- [Chronos-2: From Univariate to Universal Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15821/) (2025)
- [N-HiTS: Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12886/) (2022)
- [Forecast Evaluation for Data Scientists: Common Pitfalls and Best Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10716/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Short-term photovoltaic power forecasting requires models to represent regular solar cycles and weather-driven fluctuations whose importance changes with the forecast horizon. This study develops a hierarchical ensemble that combines temporal neural models, historical analogs, state climatology, and gradient-boosted trees. Solar geometry and numerical weather forecasts describe the expected generation conditions, while horizon-specific convex weights combine complementary predictions. A separate calibration step uses available historical forecast errors to account for recent bias. The framework is evaluated on public PVDAQ data at 15--240-minute horizons and on three GEFCom2014 solar zones at hourly horizons up to four hours. On PVDAQ, the ensemble achieves a daylight capacity-normalized mean absolute error of 4.315%, reducing error by 4.11% relative to full-feature LightGBM and by 6.03% relative to fine-tuned Chronos-2 under identical calibration. Expert-removal experiments identify redundancy within the ensemble. Across three training seeds on GEFCom2014, learned fusion improves upon equal weighting but performs comparably to LightGBM. The results support horizon-specific combination as a useful forecasting strategy while showing that its advantage over strong individual models depends on the dataset and evaluation period.