# ANASSA: An Agentic AI Orchestration Framework for Spatial Intelligence

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14824 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14824/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 7 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07864/) (2023)
- [GeoBenchX: Benchmarking LLMs in Agent Solving Multistep Geospatial Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18129/) (2025)
- [GeoFlow: Agentic Workflow Automation for Geospatial Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.04719/) (2025)
- [Spatial-Agent: Agentic Geo-spatial Reasoning with Scientific Core Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16965/) (2026)
- [Agentic AI in Remote Sensing: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Emerging Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.01891/) (2026)
- [GeoAgentBench: A Dynamic Execution Benchmark for Tool-Augmented Agents in Spatial Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13888/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [ANASSA: From High-Level Framework to Low-Level Architecture for Spatial Agentic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.14382/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) has enabled a new class of agentic systems capable of integrating natural language understanding with tool-based execution. In geographic information systems (GIS), this shift is transforming traditional, expert-driven workflows into semiautonomous systems that can interpret user intent, construct spatial workflows, and execute geospatial analysis tasks. However, existing approaches remain limited by fragmented integration of reasoning, execution, and evaluation, particularly in complex, real-world environments. This study synthesizes recent advances in agentic GIS frameworks, benchmarks, and surveys to identify limitations in spatial reasoning, execution robustness, validation, governance, and evaluation. Building on these insights, it introduces ANASSA (Autonomous Neural Agents for Spatial Systems Architecture), an agentic AI orchestration framework that integrates structured spatial reasoning, multi-agent workflow orchestration, execution feedback, authoritative spatial validation, provenance, uncertainty handling, and human decision authority within a unified system design. The contribution is an architecture-level specification: eleven components across four layers, a six-step Geospatial AI Cognitive Loop, cross-component contracts, and governance mechanisms intended to make agentic geospatial workflows traceable, reproducible, and accountable. Empirical performance evaluation is reserved for implementation and deployment studies.