# Investigating the Impacts of Generative AI on Information Seeking

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14638 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14638/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Language Model Behavior: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11504/) (2023)
- [Do LLMs write like humans? Variation in grammatical and rhetorical styles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16107/) (2024)
- [Prompting Large Language Models With the Socratic Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08769/) (2023)
- [Enhancing Critical Thinking in Education by means of a Socratic Chatbot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.05511/) (2024)
- [Generative AI Search Engines as Arbiters of Public Knowledge: An Audit of Bias and Authority](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14034/) (2024)
- [Protecting Human Cognition in the Age of AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12447/) (2025)
- [Translating Legalese: Enhancing Public Understanding of Court Opinions with Legal Summarizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06534/) (2023)
- [Introducing AI to an Online Petition Platform Changed Outputs but not Outcomes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.13949/) (2025)
- [Ethics and Persuasion in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: A Procedural Rhetorical Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09576/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper is an encore submission of our 2026 journal article "Expertise and Information Seeking in the Age of Generative AI: New Procedures, New Problematics" with an extended discussion for the CSCW 2026 "Broader Impacts of GenAI in Communication" Workshop on October 10, 2026. In the original article, we employ procedural rhetoric to analyze how generative AI chatbots leverage natural language signifiers of expertise and intelligence to influence users' perception of their trustworthiness. In this submission, we extend our conversation in the CSCW community with the goal of cultivating a cross-disciplinary vocabulary for describing, analyzing, and mitigating the risks posed by the integration of generative AI into human communication practices. It is important to develop an understanding of how the procedures surrounding information-seeking practices are informed by users' values, experiences, and expectations - and how these procedures might in future be altered by the emerging turn toward AI "experts" and authority.