# ECAS: An Edge-Controlled Agentic System for Validation-Gated Scientific Application Execution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14211 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14211/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 10 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16291/) (2023)
- [ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10144/) (2023)
- [HPC-GPT: Integrating Large Language Model for High-Performance Computing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12833/) (2023)
- [Foam-Agent 2.0: An End-to-End Composable Multi-Agent Framework for Automating CFD Simulation in OpenFOAM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18178/) (2025)
- [LLM Agents for Interactive Workflow Provenance: Reference Architecture and Evaluation Methodology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13978/) (2025)
- [Foam-Agent: A Large Language Model-Based Multi-Agent Framework for Automating Computational Fluid Dynamics Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04997/) (2025)
- [The (R)evolution of Scientific Workflows in the Agentic AI Era: Towards Autonomous Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.09915/) (2025)
- [LLM as HPC Expert: Extending RAG Architecture for HPC Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14733/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific applications increasingly rely on high-performance computing (HPC), yet translating a scientist's high-level goal into a correct target-scale execution remains brittle and labor-intensive. Large language model (LLM) agents promise to automate this, but two obstacles remain: granting a cloud-hosted model direct HPC access exposes credentials and execution authority, while withholding it demands continuous human supervision; and one-shot generation cannot adapt when generated artifacts fail in a site-specific HPC environment. We present textscECAS, an Edge-Controlled Agentic System for closed-loop execution of scientific computing campaigns with limited human intervention. textscECAS separates reasoning, control, and execution: a cloud-hosted LLM proposes plans, artifacts, and repairs; a user-controlled edge agent retains credentials, workflow state, and execution authority while enforcing policy and resource constraints; and the HPC system computes. Its core mechanism is validation-gated execution: generated artifacts pass static checks and small-scale validation, failures trigger repairs from sanitized execution feedback, and target-scale execution is permitted only after validation and policy checks pass. textscECAS also draws on an edge-resident library of expert-distilled, site-specific skills that is never disclosed to the cloud. In preliminary experiments with three scientific applications on two production ALCF systems under six injected fault types, closed-loop repair improves application success from 0/6 to 6/6 over one-shot generation, validation gating prevents all three observed target-scale failures, and skill conditioning improves success from 4/6 to 6/6. These results show the feasibility of delegating adaptive reasoning to the cloud while retaining execution control at the edge.