# Evaluation of MLLM-Agnostic Plug-and-Play Keyframe Selection Methods for Long Video Understanding

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13250 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.13250/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Video understanding with MLLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 19 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Video understanding with MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/video-understanding-with-mllms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.01144/) (2016)
- [InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14238/) (2023)
- [Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10122/) (2023)
- [Video-ChatGPT: Towards Detailed Video Understanding via Large Vision and Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05424/) (2023)
- [VideoLLaMA 2: Advancing Spatial-Temporal Modeling and Audio Understanding in Video-LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07476/) (2024)
- [VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07533/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-Video: Video Instruction Tuning With Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02713/) (2024)
- [InternVideo: General Video Foundation Models via Generative and Discriminative Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03191/) (2022)
- [SPHINX: The Joint Mixing of Weights, Tasks, and Visual Embeddings for Multi-modal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07575/) (2023)
- [Adaptive Keyframe Sampling for Long Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21271/) (2025)
- [LLaVA-Mini: Efficient Image and Video Large Multimodal Models with One Vision Token](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.03895/) (2025)
- [M-LLM Based Video Frame Selection for Efficient Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19680/) (2025)
- [Q-Frame: Query-aware Frame Selection and Multi-Resolution Adaptation for Video-LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22139/) (2025)
- [KeyVideoLLM: Towards Large-scale Video Keyframe Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03104/) (2024)
- [FOCUS: Efficient Keyframe Selection for Long Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.27280/) (2025)
- [VaQuitA: Enhancing Alignment in LLM-Assisted Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02310/) (2023)
- [MaxInfo: A Training-Free Key-Frame Selection Method Using Maximum Volume for Enhanced Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.03183/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) cannot process every frame of a long video because of limitations in visual-token and computational budgets. Three primary approaches have been proposed to enhance their long-video understanding capabilities: (i) Retraining an MLLM on a large video corpus and/or extending its input length; (ii) Training an adapter for a specific MLLM that takes the entire video and the query as input and selects the most relevant video frames; and (iii) Developing a training-free, plug-and-play (PaP) adapter that is MLLM-agnostic. We refer to the third approach as PaP keyframe selection. A PaP method may use only candidate video frames without considering the query, or it may use both candidate video frames and the query. The first approach is prohibitively expensive. The second approach requires substantial training time and computational resources, but it is accessible to many because an adapter contains significantly fewer trainable parameters than an entire MLLM. The third approach has the lowest computational cost and is therefore broadly accessible. To the best of our knowledge, only five PaP methods have been reported within the past year. All of these methods have been evaluated on one or more video question-answering benchmarks and have demonstrated improvements in long-video understanding. However, the methods were evaluated on different benchmarks using different MLLMs. We present a comprehensive evaluation of these five methods using three MLLMs across three long-video understanding benchmarks. Our results show that QAaF achieves the best performance in 13 of the 15 aggregate evaluation settings, while FOCUS ranks second overall. These results provide a common experimental reference for comparing training-free keyframe-selection methods for MLLMs.