# A Unified and Constrained View of Regularization-Based Robust Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13050 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.13050/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Adversarial robustness and RL in finance, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 10 of its 10 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Adversarial robustness and RL in finance](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/adversarial-robustness-and-rl-in-finance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Trust Region Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.05477/) (2015)
- [Constrained Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.10528/) (2017)
- [Reward Constrained Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11074/) (2018)
- [Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.03964/) (2020)
- [Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08938/) (2020)
- [Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversary](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.08452/) (2021)
- [Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial Loss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.01976/) (2020)
- [Who Is the Strongest Enemy? Towards Optimal and Efficient Evasion Attacks in Deep RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05087/) (2021)
- [Efficient Adversarial Training without Attacking: Worst-Case-Aware Robust Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05927/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Regularization-based methods have become a standard approach for training Deep Reinforcement Learning policies against adversarial input perturbations. In this paper, we unify these methods by deriving new upper bounds on the performance gap between the nominal and worst-case policies. Each upper bound is expressed as an existing regularization objective plus a KL-divergence penalty between the nominal and worst-case policies, which further explains why adding a KL penalty improves robustness in practice. Building on these bounds, we formulate robust training as a constrained optimization problem, showing that existing methods correspond to the special case of a fixed Lagrange multiplier. We instead update the multiplier jointly with the policy to automatically tune the regularization weight. Finally, we conduct extensive adversarial evaluations across several continuous control tasks to validate our theoretical analysis.