# EduFair-Bench: Evaluating Pedagogical Fairness of LLM Tutors Across Student Demographics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12949 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.12949/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06209/) (2017)
- [The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01326/) (2019)
- [BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.11718/) (2021)
- [Examining Gender and Race Bias in Two Hundred Sentiment Analysis Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04508/) (2018)
- [Queens are Powerful too: Mitigating Gender Bias in Dialogue Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03842/) (2019)
- [MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14536/) (2023)
- [Unifying AI Tutor Evaluation: An Evaluation Taxonomy for Pedagogical Ability Assessment of LLM-Powered AI Tutors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09416/) (2024)
- [MathTutorBench: A Benchmark for Measuring Open-ended Pedagogical Capabilities of LLM Tutors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18940/) (2025)
- [LLMs are Biased Teachers: Evaluating LLM Bias in Personalized Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14012/) (2024)
- [The BEA 2023 Shared Task on Generating AI Teacher Responses in Educational Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06941/) (2023)
- [Simulated Students in Tutoring Dialogues: Substance or Illusion?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.04025/) (2026)
- [Unraveling Downstream Gender Bias from Large Language Models: A Study on AI Educational Writing Assistance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03311/) (2023)
- [Protected Attributes Tell Us Who, Behavior Tells Us How: A Comparison of Demographic and Behavioral Oversampling for Fair Student Success Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10166/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as tutors, but it is unclear whether they support all students equally well. We introduce EduFair-Bench, a benchmark for auditing the pedagogical fairness of LLM tutors---whether tutoring quality varies systematically with student demographics. EduFair-Bench pairs a multi-domain question bank (mathematics, physics, chemistry) with a controlled simulation in which a fixed LLM student interacts with each tutor across nine demographic levels spanning four dimensions: gender, immigration background, first language, and socioeconomic status (SES). Tutoring quality is scored on five turn-level pedagogical metrics and four conversation-level dimensions, using an LLM judge validated against three-annotator consensus on 180 tutor turns. Bias is measured via paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and bootstrap effect-size confidence intervals. Two ablations (demographic cues conveyed through names; conflicting demographic information between tutor and student) disentangle tutor-driven from student-driven bias. Across five tutors, we find that model capability and demographic fairness are largely orthogonal: the smallest model is the most consistent while the four more capable tutors all exhibit wide demographic gaps with no clear capability-to-fairness ordering, pedagogy-specific RL training redistributes rather than removes bias, and language- and immigration-related cues produce larger gaps than gender- and SES-related cues.