# VRL-Bench: Benchmarking agents on computer control tasks under finite trial budgets

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12404 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.12404/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 16 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Reinforcement learning for LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/reinforcement-learning-for-llm-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01206/) (2022)
- [ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10144/) (2023)
- [Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14992/) (2023)
- [CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11738/) (2023)
- [Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11868/) (2026)
- [Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04618/) (2025)
- [Agent Workflow Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07429/) (2024)
- [Reinforcement Learning on Web Interfaces Using Workflow-Guided Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08802/) (2018)
- [AI Agents That Matter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01502/) (2024)
- [Synapse: Trajectory-as-Exemplar Prompting with Memory for Computer Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07863/) (2023)
- [Dynamic Cheatsheet: Test-Time Learning with Adaptive Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07952/) (2025)
- [Agent-Pro: Learning to Evolve via Policy-Level Reflection and Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17574/) (2024)
- [Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11977/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Learning from trial and error is a promising way to improve language agents on complex tasks such as computer control. Reflexion introduced verbal reinforcement learning, which turns failed trials into text that guides later attempts without updating model parameters. We introduce VRL-Bench, a harness for fair evaluation of trial-and-error learning under finite trial budgets. Across three models on MiniWoB and WebShop, we evaluate updates from several prominent verbal-memory methods spanning Reflexion and later work: each improves observed success over memory-free retry in some settings but reduces it in others. Replay experiments show that using reflection can reduce success rates, revealing a trade-off between exploiting experience and continued exploration. We propose VEX2, a verbal exploration--exploitation scheduler that uses a language model to jointly select policies and allocate the remaining trial budget. VEX2 is the only evaluated update to achieve positive observed success-rate gains over retry in all six settings.