# READ: Learning Risk-Informed Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12371 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.12371/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in End-to-end system architecture, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving.
- Builds on 26 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- End-to-end autonomous driving / [End-to-end system architecture](https://mlsanity.com/driving/end-to-end-system-architecture/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Planning-oriented Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10156/) (2022)
- [GAIA-1: A Generative World Model for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17080/) (2023)
- [DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14150/) (2023)
- [DriveVLM: The Convergence of Autonomous Driving and Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12289/) (2024)
- [End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.02410/) (2017)
- [TransFuser: Imitation with Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15997/) (2022)
- [NAVSIM: Data-Driven Non-Reactive Autonomous Vehicle Simulation and Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15349/) (2024)
- [DiffusionDrive: Truncated Diffusion Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15139/) (2024)
- [Driving into the Future: Multiview Visual Forecasting and Planning with World Model for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.17918/) (2023)
- [AutoVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Adaptive Reasoning and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13757/) (2025)
- [Hydra-MDP: End-to-end Multimodal Planning with Multi-target Hydra-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06978/) (2024)
- [FIERY: Future Instance Prediction in Bird's-Eye View from Surround Monocular Cameras](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.10490/) (2021)
- [FutureSightDrive: Thinking Visually with Spatio-Temporal CoT for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17685/) (2025)
- [End-to-End Driving with Online Trajectory Evaluation via BEV World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01941/) (2025)
- [DriveVLA-W0: World Models Amplify Data Scaling Law in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12796/) (2025)
- [Reason2Drive: Towards Interpretable and Chain-based Reasoning for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.03661/) (2023)
- [AdaThinkDrive: Adaptive Thinking via Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13769/) (2025)
- [iPad: Iterative Proposal-centric End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15111/) (2025)
- [SGDrive: Scene-to-Goal Hierarchical World Cognition for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05640/) (2026)
- [Latent-WAM: Latent World Action Modeling for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24581/) (2026)
- [Drive-JEPA: Video JEPA Meets Multimodal Trajectory Distillation for End-to-End Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22032/) (2026)
- [MeanFuser: Fast One-Step Multi-Modal Trajectory Generation and Adaptive Reconstruction via MeanFlow for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20060/) (2026)
- [Percept-WAM: Perception-Enhanced World-Awareness-Action Model for Robust End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.19221/) (2025)
- [One-4-All: Neural Potential Fields for Embodied Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04011/) (2023)
- [FlowDrive: Energy Flow Field for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.14303/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous driving requires more than recognizing what is present in a scene: a planner must determine how road structure, surrounding agents, and their motion states should influence a future maneuver. Existing learning-based planners can capture these influences through latent scene features and trajectory decoders, but the relationship between environmental factors and candidate actions often remains implicit. This limits the ability to inspect, diagnose, or refine how scene context affects the safety of a predicted trajectory. Classical safety fields provide an explicit spatial representation of this relationship, but their risk shapes and relative weights are prescribed in advance and do not adapt to each scene. We introduce READ, a framework that learns an explicit, planning-aligned risk representation from complementary geometric and behavioral constraints. READ instantiates this representation as a continuous spatiotemporal field, enabling differentiable queries along candidate trajectories. The learned field connects scene understanding with action selection by encouraging predicted trajectories to align with low-risk regions, while retaining a differentiable interface for trajectory evaluation and refinement. READ integrates with both end-to-end planners and Vision-Language-Action models. Experiments on NAVSIM show consistent gains across matched end-to-end backbones and strong performance in a VLA setting; READ also achieves competitive results on NAVSIM v2. These results establish learned spatial risk as an explicit, adaptable representation for safe planning.