# Quantifying Consonant Contributions to Word Intelligibility via Acoustic Masking

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12122 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.12122/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04356/) (2022)
- [Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.06670/) (2019)
- [Qwen3-Omni Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17765/) (2025)
- [Scaling Speech Technology to 1,000+ Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13516/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-ASR Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21337/) (2026)
- [[b] = [d] - [t] + [p]: Self-supervised Speech Models Discover Phonological Vector Arithmetic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.18899/) (2026)
- [Speech Intelligibility Assessment of Dysarthric Speech by using Goodness of Pronunciation with Uncertainty Quantification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18392/) (2023)
- [Adapting Self-Supervised Speech Representations for Cross-lingual Dysarthria Detection in Parkinson's Disease](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22225/) (2026)
- [Evaluating Speech Synthesis by Training Recognizers on Synthetic Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00706/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Consonants contribute unequally to whether a word is understood. Given the limited time available for therapy, ranking consonants by contribution to intelligibility helps prioritize intervention targets in motor speech disorders. However, measuring this contribution relies on perceptual studies that are difficult to scale. This paper presents a scalable method that measures consonant contribution using acoustic masking. We silence one consonant at a time in an isolated word and test whether an automatic speech recognition (ASR) model still recognizes the word. We define a consonant's contribution score as the proportion of its masked instances for which the word becomes misrecognized, which we refer to as the mask-induced misrecognition rate (MMR). We relate MMR to two linguistic factors previously reported to correlate with consonant contribution, namely phoneme frequency and functional load. We apply this analysis across four languages, English, Spanish, German, and Czech, using three ASR architectures, MMS (encoder-only), Whisper (encoder-decoder), and Qwen3-ASR (LLM-based). Using partial Spearman correlations, we find that phoneme frequency correlates negatively with MMR while functional load correlates positively. In other words, more frequent consonants are less disruptive when masked, whereas consonants carrying more lexical contrast are more disruptive. Further cross-language analysis shows that consonant rankings agree only partially across languages, indicating that consonant contribution is language-dependent.