# Breaking the Central Bias: Spatially Partitioned Experts for Coordinate-Based Neuroevolution

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11518 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11518/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MoE theory and gating functions, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts.
- Builds on 2 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Mixture-of-experts / [MoE theory and gating functions](https://mlsanity.com/moe/moe-theory-and-gating-functions/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [Investigating Hyperparameter Optimization and Transferability for ES-HyperNEAT: A TPE Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00449/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Evolvable-Substrate HyperNEAT (ES-HyperNEAT), a bio-inspired indirect encoding that determines neuron placement and connection weights from spatial coordinates, exhibits a failure mode on MNIST as a diagnostic benchmark. Because input pixels map to a coordinate space centered at the origin, evolved networks converge on a small central cluster of input pixels, a spatial-concentration bias; prior work observed only 21% mean accuracy in this regime. Is this bias an optimization artifact or an architectural ceiling? Inspired by Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) principles, we partition the input into non-overlapping spatial segments, each assigned to a separately evolved specialist network. With 13 such experts, this design reaches 43% mean accuracy, a 106% relative improvement over the baseline. The architectural gain does not depend on data-driven aggregation: equal-weighted averaging, which uses no validation data, already yields a 70% improvement; the gain comes from partitioning, not the weighting. Receptive-field analysis shows the mechanism: partitioning forces evolution to discover features across the entire image, expanding active pixel coverage from 4% to 79%. Absolute accuracy stays below gradient-trained baselines, but the relative gain points to central bias, not the evolutionary search. Two tools are designed to generalize beyond MNIST: a receptive-field diagnostic for silent input-coverage collapse, and a spatial-partitioning remedy that restores coverage.