# Rubric-Aligned Disentangled Evaluation of Human Simultaneous Interpreting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11131 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11131/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17760/) (2023)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05579/) (2024)
- [CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06243/) (2022)
- [Efficient Wait-k Models for Simultaneous Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.08595/) (2020)
- [BSTC: A Large-Scale Chinese-English Speech Translation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.03575/) (2021)
- [Average Token Delay: A Latency Metric for Simultaneous Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13173/) (2022)
- [Seed LiveInterpret 2.0: End-to-end Simultaneous Speech-to-speech Translation with Your Voice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17527/) (2025)
- [Exploring the Correlation between Human and Machine Evaluation of Simultaneous Speech Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10091/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Human simultaneous interpreting (SI) is commonly assessed with analytic rubrics separating meaning transfer, delivery quality, and temporal synchrony, yet no automatic metric is designed for rubric-aligned segment-level SI evaluation. We construct a professionally annotated corpus of 1,101 SI segments with scores for meaning transfer (LQ), delivery quality (EXP), and perceived latency (LAT). We show that structured LLM prompting and scalar supervision collapse rubric dimensions, yielding near-zero correlation with human ratings and strong cross-dimension coupling. To isolate supervision structure under identical backbone capacity, we introduce dual regression heads on a LoRA-adapted COMET-KIWI encoder. On a held-out talk-level test set, the model achieves Pearson correlations of 0.388 (LQ) and 0.301 (EXP), improving over frozen COMET-KIWI. Given low absolute rater agreement, we interpret results relative to human consistency and target stable ranking signals for formative assessment.