# TrajMark: Ownership Attribution and Segment-Level Tamper Localization for Coding-Agent Trajectories

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10416 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.10416/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 32 of its 58 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)
- LLM safety and security / [Watermarking generated content and models](https://mlsanity.com/safety/watermarking-generated-content-and-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06070/) (2023)
- [OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07972/) (2024)
- [A Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10226/) (2023)
- [Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15593/) (2023)
- [Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17439/) (2023)
- [CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07339/) (2024)
- [Who Wrote this Code? Watermarking for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15060/) (2023)
- [Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10669/) (2023)
- [EditGuard: Versatile Image Watermarking for Tamper Localization and Copyright Protection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08883/) (2023)
- [MarkLLM: An Open-Source Toolkit for LLM Watermarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10051/) (2024)
- [SWE-PolyBench: A multi-language benchmark for repository level evaluation of coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08703/) (2025)
- [Robust Multi-bit Natural Language Watermarking through Invariant Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01904/) (2023)
- [A Robust Semantics-based Watermark for Large Language Model against Paraphrasing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08721/) (2023)
- [Advancing Beyond Identification: Multi-bit Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00221/) (2023)
- [Watermark Anything with Localized Messages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07231/) (2024)
- [OmniGuard: Hybrid Manipulation Localization via Augmented Versatile Deep Image Watermarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01615/) (2024)
- [WaterBench: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Watermarks for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07138/) (2023)
- [WatME: Towards Lossless Watermarking Through Lexical Redundancy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09832/) (2023)
- [Revisiting the Robustness of Watermarking to Paraphrasing Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.05277/) (2024)
- [CodeIP: A Grammar-Guided Multi-Bit Watermark for Large Language Models of Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15639/) (2024)
- [BiMark: Unbiased Multilayer Watermarking for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21602/) (2025)
- [Marking Code Without Breaking It: Code Watermarking for Detecting LLM-Generated Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18851/) (2025)
- [AgentMark: Utility-Preserving Behavioral Watermarking for Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03294/) (2026)
- [On Protecting Agentic Systems' Intellectual Property via Watermarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08401/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Watermarking the final patch produced by a coding agent provides provenance evidence for the submitted artifact, but does not authenticate the visible process that produced it. Behavioral watermarking methods primarily provide a global detection or identifier-recovery signal, so a locally edited trajectory may retain sufficient ownership evidence without revealing which protected region has become inconsistent. To address this limitation, we propose TrajMark, a training-free, symmetric-key, visible-only trajectory watermarking framework that separates robust ownership attribution from fragile local integrity verification. Our framework consists of two complementary layers: a sparse owner layer that encodes a six-bit deployment identifier by rewriting a keyed subset of naturally occurring READ actions into masked linear equations, and a localization layer that inserts linked Q12 ordinary, group, and terminal seals to commit to protected critical-action segments. This separation allows ownership evidence to accumulate robustly across trajectories, while local modifications perturb nearby keyed commitments and expose the affected protocol region. We further provide a design-level analysis of owner recoverability, integrity collision probability, structural overhead, and localization behavior. Across three coding-agent frameworks and three LLMs, TrajMark recovers the exact owner in all evaluated clean full-watermark batches. Under exhaustive eligible single-site attacks it detects 95.5%-100% of edits, and under random single-action corruption it localizes 95.8% of modified sites to an accepted protocol region rather than to the individual action. Owner marking adds no trajectory actions; the integrity layer adds explicit read-only seals, and matched Pass@1 is 26.9% versus 26.3% for unwatermarked runs.