# FlowCPO: A Unified Divergence View of Preference Alignment for Flow Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09905 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.09905/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 53 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion and flow policies for robotics](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-and-flow-policies-for-robotics/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Diffusion and multimodal model alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/diffusion-and-multimodal-model-alignment/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12598/) (2022)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05977/) (2023)
- [Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15571/) (2022)
- [Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13301/) (2023)
- [Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01569/) (2023)
- [GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11513/) (2023)
- [A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12036/) (2023)
- [Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09341/) (2023)
- [Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12908/) (2023)
- [Maximum Likelihood Training of Score-Based Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09258/) (2021)
- [Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05470/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.00909/) (2018)
- [DPOK: Reinforcement Learning for Fine-tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16381/) (2023)
- [Directly Fine-Tuning Diffusion Models on Differentiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17400/) (2023)
- [SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10425/) (2023)
- [Understanding Diffusion Models: A Unified Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.11970/) (2022)
- [The Vendi Score: A Diversity Evaluation Metric for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02410/) (2022)
- [Flow Matching Guide and Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06264/) (2024)
- [Aligning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Reward Backpropagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03739/) (2023)
- [Improving Video Generation with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13918/) (2025)
- [Using Human Feedback to Fine-tune Diffusion Models without Any Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13231/) (2023)
- [DiffusionNFT: Online Diffusion Reinforcement with Forward Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16117/) (2025)
- [Unified Reward Model for Multimodal Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05236/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [UltraText Bench: A Comprehensive Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Text Rendering in Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.09823/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Preference alignment for flow and diffusion models now spans online reinforcement learning and offline preference optimization, but the relation between these methods remains unclear. In particular, existing forward-process alignment methods require fresh samples from the current model, while offline methods based on fixed preference pairs rely primarily on positive-only fine-tuning or DPO-style likelihood-ratio surrogates. We organize these approaches through a divergence-based framework and introduce FlowCPO, an offline forward-KL objective that uses both preferred and dispreferred samples without online rollouts. For linear interpolation, we show under explicit regularity conditions that the forward-KL objective is bounded by a contrastive flow matching loss, yielding a tractable surrogate on fixed data. We further show that this loss is nonnegative, whereas the signed regression loss of simplified FlowDPO can be unbounded below. In the in-domain setting, FlowCPO achieves higher mean GenEval and OCR scores than the evaluated baselines, reaching 0.84 and 0.87 versus 0.81 and 0.74 for FlowDPO at CFG 3.0. In the out-of-domain setting, the results are mixed, with the best GenEval result but lower reward scores than RFT on several metrics.