# Beyond Accuracy: ARIA-Rubrics for Evaluating Audio Reasoning in Large Audio Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09681 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.09681/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 19 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Audio language models and spoken dialogue, one of 11 directions in Speech and audio language models.
- Builds on 24 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.

## Placed in

- Speech and audio language models / [Audio language models and spoken dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/speech/audio-language-models-and-spoken-dialogue/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.19348/) (2026)
- [MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09297/) (2020)
- [Large-scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.06687/) (2022)
- [TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02385/) (2024)
- [MMAU: A Massive Multi-Task Audio Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19168/) (2024)
- [The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06941/) (2025)
- [AIR-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models via Generative Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07729/) (2024)
- [ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07919/) (2022)
- [Prompt, Generate, then Cache: Cascade of Foundation Models makes Strong Few-shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02151/) (2023)
- [Exploring the Reasoning Abilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs): A Comprehensive Survey on Emerging Trends in Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06805/) (2024)
- [ReCEval: Evaluating Reasoning Chains via Correctness and Informativeness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10703/) (2023)
- [Audio-CoT: Exploring Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Audio Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07246/) (2025)
- [SocREval: Large Language Models with the Socratic Method for Reference-Free Reasoning Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00074/) (2023)
- [SoundMind: RL-Incentivized Logic Reasoning for Audio-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12935/) (2025)
- [Don't Get Lost in the Trees: Streamlining LLM Reasoning by Overcoming Tree Search Exploration Pitfalls](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11183/) (2025)
- [AudSemThinker: Enhancing Audio-Language Models through Reasoning over Semantics of Sound](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14142/) (2025)
- [The Interspeech 2026 Audio Reasoning Challenge: Evaluating Reasoning Process Quality for Audio Reasoning Models and Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14224/) (2026)
- [The MUSE Benchmark: Probing Music Perception and Auditory Relational Reasoning in Audio LLMS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19055/) (2025)
- [JudgeBoard: Benchmarking and Enhancing Small Language Models for Reasoning Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.15958/) (2025)
- [When Scaling Fails: Mitigating Audio Perception Decay of LALMs via Multi-Step Perception-Aware Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02266/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have shown strong performance on audio reasoning benchmarks, but accuracy alone cannot distinguish true reasoning from superficial pattern matching, often overestimating reasoning ability since high scores may result from guessing rather than genuine audio understanding. Evaluating the reasoning process itself is essential for improving LALMs' reasoning ability, yet remains challenging. Existing methods either rely on costly human annotation or opaque LLM-as-judge approaches, making them impractical, biased, and lacking transparency. Moreover, audio reasoning introduces unique challenges absent in text-based settings, perceptual hallucination and cross-modal alignment between audio understanding and textual inference, hence text-based evaluation frameworks cannot be directly applied. Therefore, we propose ARIA-Rubrics (Audio Reasoning Integrity Assessment), a lightweight, annotation-free gold reasoning chains, automatic and transparent framework comprising six complementary metrics that evaluate audio reasoning quality across perceptual grounding, reasoning coherence, and answer consistency. We use Chain-of-Thought prompting as an externalization mechanism to make the reasoning process observable. Experiments on 9 models across 2 benchmarks identify three reasoning modes of current LALMs with actionable directions for future development, with ARIA-Rubrics achieving high correlation with human judgments. The code is available at the Github Repository.
