# MRI-Guided Reslice-Refined Cross-Slice SDF Reconstruction of the Left Ventricle from Cardiac MRI with Sparse Axial Supervision

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08148 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.08148/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05989/) (2022)
- [DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.05103/) (2019)
- [V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04797/) (2016)
- [NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.10689/) (2021)
- [TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04306/) (2021)
- [Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning Shapes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.10099/) (2020)
- [Evaluation of Algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An Open-Access Grand Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07880/) (2019)
- [NISF: Neural Implicit Segmentation Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08643/) (2023)
- [Medical SAM3: A Foundation Model for Universal Prompt-Driven Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.10880/) (2026)
- [Multi-view Hybrid Graph Convolutional Network for Volume-to-mesh Reconstruction in Cardiovascular MRI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13706/) (2023)
- [Explicit Differentiable Slicing and Global Deformation for Cardiac Mesh Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02070/) (2024)
- [End-to-End 4D Heart Mesh Recovery Across Full-Stack and Sparse Cardiac MRI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.12090/) (2025)
- [MedTet: An Online Motion Model for 4D Heart Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.02589/) (2024)
- [Neural Implicit Heart Coordinates: 3D cardiac shape reconstruction from sparse segmentations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19316/) (2025)
- [S2MDF: A Plug-And-Play Layer for Intersection-Free Multi-Object Signed Distance Fields](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.29761/) (2026)
- [Transformer-Guided Graph Attention for Direct Cardiac Mesh Reconstruction: A Structural Digital Twin Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.13188/) (2026)
- [NISF++: Geometrically-grounded implicit representations of 3D+time cardiac function from 2D short- and long-axis MR views](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.00752/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reconstructing a three-dimensional left-ventricular (LV) endocardial surface from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) data is challenging when supervision is available on only a small number of axial slices. Through-plane geometry is weakly constrained, and automatically generated two-dimensional masks can propagate segmentation errors into the recovered shape. We present MR-RS-SDFR, a per-case implicit signed distance field (SDF) framework that reconstructs a continuous LV surface from a CMR volume and sparse axial weak masks. The method first builds a cross-slice SDF initialization from axial and longitudinal geometric cues and then refines the field using two complementary signals: MRI edge-field normal alignment, which provides an image-derived boundary cue independent of the weak masks, and differentiable reslice Dice and contour consistency, which preserve agreement with the observed planes. We evaluate three weak-mask generators -- LOO TransUNet, LOO nnU-Net, and an off-the-shelf Medical SAM3 model used without MM-WHS-specific training or fine-tuning -- and five sparsity levels from 4 to 64 axial planes. In the sparse-16 setting, final MR-RS-SDFR reconstruction reaches 0.928 Dice and 3.80mm HD95 with Medical SAM3 masks. The upstream generators do not exhibit a single common ranking across 2D and dense 3D segmentation, and nnU-Net- and Medical-SAM3-driven sparse reconstruction achieve the same mean final Dice despite different upstream error profiles. Across all three sparse-16 mask sources, MR-RS-SDFR is numerically better than protocol-matched full GHD+DVS in both Dice and HD95. Final Dice improves markedly from sparse-4 to sparse-16 and then saturates at the reported precision through sparse-64. These results support MRI-guided per-case SDF refinement as a reconstruction strategy that remains effective across weak-mask generators and supervision densities.
